1,720,973 research outputs found

    Real-life Data on the Effect of Medical Therapy for Amiodarone-induced Thyrotoxicosis on CV Events and Hospitalizations

    No full text
    Context Patients with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) often receive initial therapy for thyrotoxicosis in several different medical settings before admission to a referral center. Objective This work aimed to determine whether first-line medical therapy (ie, therapies for thyrotoxicosis at first diagnosis of AIT) affects the outcome of AIT patients. Methods A single-center historical-prospective cohort study was conducted on 313 AIT patients. Clinical and biochemical data were collected at first diagnosis, at a referral center, and during the course of AIT. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) events and hospitalizations. First-line therapies were considered appropriate when they included glucocorticoids for type 2 AIT and methimazole for type 1 AIT at the approved dose, either alone (optimal medical therapy, OMT) or in combination (right-dose combination therapy, RCT). Other therapies were considered not appropriate, including no therapy. Duration of exposure to thyrotoxicosis was the time from first diagnosis of AIT to its remission. Results A total of 34.5% patients received appropriate therapies (28.1% OMT, 6.4% RCT), whereas the remaining (65.5%) received inappropriate therapies. CV events and hospitalizations were more frequent in patients who received inappropriate therapies (33.2% vs 4.5%, and 24.9% vs 6.5%, respectively; P < .0001 for both). Appropriate therapies reduced serum thyroid hormone concentrations (P = .018) from first diagnosis to referral, unlike the inappropriate therapies. The duration of exposure to thyrotoxicosis was longer in patients receiving inappropriate therapies and was a risk factor for arrhythmias (hazard ratio [HR] 1.004; P = .0008), major acute CV events (HR 1.004; P = .020), and hospitalizations (HR 1.006; P < .0001). Conclusion The first medical therapy of AIT influences the exposure time to thyrotoxicosis and the occurrence of CV events and hospitalizations

    Calcifediol Rather Than Cholecalciferol for a Patient Submitted to Malabsortive Bariatric Surgery: A Case Report

    Get PDF
    Vitamin D deficiency following malabsorptive bariatric surgery can lead to osteomalacia. We report a patient with severe vitamin D deficiency following malabsorptive bariatric surgery successfully treated with calcifediol but not cholecalciferol. A 40-year-old woman, submitted to biliopancreatic diversion 20 years before and chronically treated with 50,000 IU cholecalciferol weekly, was admitted to our Endocrine Unit because of severe lower back pain, muscle weakness, and generalized muscular hypotrophy, associated with hypocalcemia and elevated PTH levels. Initial evaluation revealed low serum albumin, low albumin-corrected serum calcium (7.36 mg/dL), high serum PTH (240 pg/mL), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (125 μg/L) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (112 pg/mL) concentrations, undetectable serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (<7 ng/mL), and evidence of reduced liver function. Bone mineral density was markedly low. Normocalcemia was initially restored with intravenous albumin and calcium gluconate. Treatment with calcitriol (0.5 μg three times daily) and oral calcium carbonate (1000 mg daily) was simultaneously started and cholecalciferol was replaced with calcifediol [125 μg (5000 IU) daily)]. During follow-up the calcifediol dose was progressively tapered to 25 μg (1000 IU) daily and the calcitriol dose was progressively reduced and finally withdrawn. Serum albumin and other biochemical parameters normalized, bone mineral density significantly increased, and the patient's clinical conditions progressively improved, with a substantial recovery of autonomy. Serum vitamin D binding protein at the last observation was in the normal range. Our data suggest that calcifediol might be more efficacious than cholecalciferol for prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency in patients treated by malabsorptive bariatric surgery

    Diabetes mellitus induced by somatostatin analogue therapy is not permanent in acromegalic patients

    Get PDF
    CONTEXT: Therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) may have deleterious effects on glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly, often leading to the development of diabetes mellitus (DM). AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether DM, developed during therapy with SSAs, may revert after drug withdrawal and cure of acromegaly with pituitary adenomectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, in a tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: Eighteen acromegalic patients without DM at the diagnosis of acromegaly treated with SSAs as a primary therapy, and then cured by pituitary adenomectomy. METHODS: Endocrine status and glucose homeostasis were evaluated at diagnosis of acromegaly and at least every 6 months during SSA therapy. At each visit, patients were classified into one of the following classes: normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, overt diabetes. RESULTS: Median follow-up after starting SSAs therapy was 69 months (IQR 54.75-132.25). During SSA therapy, all patients had controlled acromegaly defined by normal serum IGF1 concentrations for the age. Of the 13 euglycaemic patients at diagnosis, three developed prediabetes and three diabetes, whereas, of the five prediabetic patients at diagnosis, two worsened to overt diabetes and three remained in the prediabetic range (P = 0.04). After curing acromegaly with pituitary adenomectomy and subsequent SSA withdrawal, prediabetes reverted in five of six patients, and diabetes in all five patients (three reverted to euglycaemia, while two reverted to prediabetes) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients with controlled disease, changes in glycaemic status induced by SSAs are not permanent

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore