1,720,965 research outputs found
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials:test-retest reliability
No full textVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are myogenic responses induced by stimulation of the saccular macula by intense sound stimuli, The responses are recordable from the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. We recorded VEMPs from normal subjects (up to three times in each subject) to identify: i) the best recording procedures, ii) the reliability. and iii) the normal limits for both individual point and test-retest evaluation.
We adopted a recording setting in which the subjects were asked to simultaneously activate both SCM muscles by pushing their forehead against a load cell during a bilateral acoustic stimulation. This system enabled subjects to monitor their intensity of SCM activation and to keep intensity constant: us to record VEMPs from both sides simultaneously. and thus to minimize the duration of the recording session.
For each subject we considered the mean and the difference (divided by the mean) of the values derived from the two SCM muscles of the latency of the P13 and N23 components and of the P13-N23 peak-to-peak amplitude.
Reliability was evaluated by estimate of the intraclass correlation coefficient, and was good or excellent for all parameters. with the exception of the P13-N23 amplitude side-difference. To take advantage of all the data available, we computed the normal limits for both individual point and test-retest evaluation by means of the variability indices used for the evaluation of reliability.
In this system, VEMP recording is simple, inexpensive and rapid. It is well tolerated by subjects, and easily implemented in laboratories equipped for evoked potential recording
Circadian and hypothermia-induced effects on visual and auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis
No full textEye movement quantitative evaluation before and after high-dose 6-methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis
No full text
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in multiple sclerosis patients
No full textObjectives: Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are saccular responses to loud acoustic stimuli and are recordable from the sterno-cleido-mastoid muscle ipsilaterally to the stimulated ear. This study aimed to investigate VEMPs in patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS), and to compare these findings with both clinical and instrumental data. Methods: We recorded VEMPs from 70 MS patients, whose clinical data were retrospectively evaluated for the possible occurrence of: past and current (with respect to VEMP recording) brainstem and/or cerebellar symptoms; current brainstem and/or cerebellar signs. Sixty-five patients underwent brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) recording; 63 of the same patients underwent saccadic eye movement recording and subjective visual vertical (SVV) evaluation. Results: VEMPs were abnormal in 31%, BAEPs in 38% and SVV in 21% of the patients. Saccadic eye movements showed a possible brainstem dysfunction in 44.4% of the patients. There was no correlation between the occurrence of abnormalities and the technical means of detection. The same held true for correlations with clinical data, with the exception of the BAEPs; these proved to be more frequently abnormal in patients presenting at neurological examination with brainstem and/or cerebellar signs that were possibly related to the complaint of dizziness. Conclusions: VEMP's should be considered a useful complementary neurophysiological tool for the evaluation of brainstem dysfunction. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved
Eye movement abnormalities in myotonic dystrophy
No full textWe studied saccade and smooth pursuit eye movements in 31 patients suffering from myotonic dstrophy (MD). On the basis of mean value comparisons, saccades were slower and hypometric and smooth pursuit eye movements performed worse in MD patients than in controls. On an individual basis, saccade duration was prolonged in 67.7%, saccades were hypometric in 19.4%, saccade latency was delayed in 9.7%, and the smooth pursuit performance index was decreased in 9.7% of patients. Eye movement abnormalities did not correlate with those detectable by visual, brain-stem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials. We attempted to classify eye movement abnormalities as myogenic or neurogenic on the basis of differences in combination of eye movement abnormalities and the occurrence of D5/D35 dissociation; the latter consists of a prolonged duration for large (35°) but not for small (5°) saccades. Since D5/D35 dissociation occurred in 26/33 multiple sclerosis patients with increased saccade duration, we considered it to be a neurogenic pattern attributable to a central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction. A prolonged duration without dissociation especially in combination with saccade hypometria, is interpreted as a myogenic pattern, although the lack of dissociation may also occur with CNS impairment in case of a marked increase in saccade duration. Accordingly we classified the oculomotor abnormalities detected as neurogenic in 11 MD patients and as myogenic in another 10, but in some subjects belonging to the second group concomitant CNS impairment is not to be excluded. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
