1,720,972 research outputs found

    BDNF and NT-3 applied in the whisker pad reverse cortical changes after peripheral deafferentation in neonatal rats

    No full text
    It has been known for a long time that subcortical input drives the specification of cortical areas. Molecular signals mediating this instructive effect from the periphery are poorly understood. In foetal or neonatal rats, ablation of whisker follicles, transection of the infraorbital nerve, inhibition of axonal transport, but not impulse activity blockade, prevent formation of barrels in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). These findings suggest that a chemical signal, possibly arising from the skin or the follicle, may be responsible for somatotopic pattern formation in S1. Neurotrophins promote survival and differentiation of primary sensory neurons, and are expressed in the whisker pad during development. Neonatal rats received gelfoam impregnated with NGF, BDNF or NT-3 under the whisker pad following surgical denervation of whisker rows D and E on P0. Barrel formation in S1 was assessed on P7 by acetylcholinesterase histochemistry and 5-HT-immunohistochemistry. BDNF and NT-3, but not NGF, promoted development of the cortical barrels corresponding to denervated whiskers. Furthermore, BDNF and NT-3 prevented the lesion-induced expansion of row C barrels, while NGF appeared to promote row C expansion. Our results suggest that BDNF and NT-3 arising from the whisker pad are involved in the formation and/or maintenance of the barrel pattern in S1. These findings are potentially relevant for the prevention of sensory disturbances possibly due to reorganization of central sensory circuits after peripheral nerve lesions in humans

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Conoscere | osservare

    No full text
    “Forse l’osservazione delle cose è stata la mia più importante educazione formale; poi l’osservazione si è tramutata in una memoria di queste cose. Ora mi sembra di vederle tutte disposte come utensili in bella fila; allineate come in un erbario, in un elenco, in un dizionario. Ma questo elenco tra immaginazione e memoria non è neutrale, esso ritorna sempre su alcuni oggetti e ne costituisce anche la deforma- zione o in qualche modo l’evoluzione”1. Una conoscenza che non vuole una ‘teoria della giustificazione’ ma che si costruisce, attraverso un insieme di regole individuate e condivise, forme possibili di spazi collettivi e domestici. Conoscenza rappresentativa del proprio valore, ‘esatta’, quella che definisce ‘adeguatezza’ ovvero valori propriamente disciplinari legati all’architettura

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore