1,720,984 research outputs found
Analisi di Penicilline e Cefalosporine mediante cromatografia liquido- liquido di coppie ioniche a fasi invertite
Quantitative structure-activity relationships in a set of antimuscarinic agents.
Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) have been formulated for the interactions of a set of antimuscarinic agents. The antagonistic activity is found to be dependent on hydrophobic-lipophilic character and steric requirements of substituents R1 and R2 in structures of type R1R2N--CH2--CH2--+NR3R4R5. Moreover, it is shown that the incumbrance of R3, R4 and R5 groups and their polar effects on the onium ending greatly affect the antagonistic activity. A binding model which suggests new avenues for exploration is presented
Identificazione e dosaggio di cefalosporine mediante cromatografia in fase liquida ad alta pressione
Inhibition of butyrylcholinesterase by organophosphorus compounds: a quantitative structure-activity analysis.
Quantitative structure-activity relationships have been formulated for the interactions of a variety of inhibitors with butyrylcholinesterase. The parameters KQ, k2 and ki are found to be strongly dependent on molar refractivity as well as on the inductive effect of the leaving group --SR' in structures of the RO (X) P (O) SR' type. A model for the interaction of organophosphorus compounds is presented which gives a consistent view of the binding step, acylation and overall inhibition
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
