1,721,467 research outputs found
C. Rizzo ex librise
http://www.lib.unideb.huDebreceni Egyetem Egyetemi és Nemzeti KönyvtárKétoldalt keresztes medaillonokkal díszített boltív alatt Aszklépiosz kígyós kelyhe, előtte könyvön koponya. Kétoldalt latin felirat: Honor(i)a(?) medicum. Felül és alul felirat: Ex libris Dott(ore) C. Rizzo. A nyomat alján olvashatatlan írás, ebből megfejthető az évszám: 1929. Az alkotó neve monogrammal jelölve.metsze
C. Rizzo, S. Parisi, P. Pes - Manuale per la raccolta, localizzazione et siglatura delle interpretazioni Rorschach
C. Rizzo, S. Parisi, P. Pes - Manuale per la raccolta, localizzazione et siglatura delle interpretazioni Rorschach. In: Bulletin de la Société française du Rorschach et des méthodes projectives, n°32, 1981. Les toxicomanies. pp. 150-151
C. Rizzo, S. Parisi, P. Pes - Manuale per la raccolta, localizzazione et siglatura delle interpretazioni Rorschach
C. Rizzo, S. Parisi, P. Pes - Manuale per la raccolta, localizzazione et siglatura delle interpretazioni Rorschach. In: Bulletin de la Société française du Rorschach et des méthodes projectives, n°32, 1981. Les toxicomanies. pp. 150-151
”I disturbi della condotta alimentare in pre-adolescenza; rischio psicopatologico e disturbi conclamati. Uno studio epidemiologico clinico. (eating disorders in pre-adolecence)"
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
How is trait emotional intelligence important for different professional roles? An empirical contribution
Objective:
Trait Emotional Intelligence (or “trait emotional self-efficacy”) as a personality trait differs from Emotional Intelligence as cognitive ability, i.e. the ability to perceive, integrate and regulate emotions. Trait EI, instead, is currently defined as a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions located at the lower level of personality hierarchies. Emotional intelligence is deemed to promote personal growth and thus appears a crucial factor in the coaching process. In this paper we aimed to investigate difference in TEI within four different groups. The main goal was to point out a profile of strengths and weaknesses of the different job roles.
Design:
A questionnaire that measures Trait Emotional Intelligence (TEIQue) was administered to participants (30 coaches, 88 managers, 100 employees and 90 university students). A multivariate profile analysis (MANOVA) was conducted in order to depict differences between these groups.
Method:
The TEIQue consists of 153 item and 13 facets, organized under four second order factors: well-being, self-control, emotionality and sociability. All scales exhibited good internal reliability.
Results:
Results pointed out that groups have different profiles. In general coaches and managers scores higher on most of the different sub-scales of the TEIQue.
Conclusion:
This paper aimed to have practical implications for the professional efficacy of coaches and managers. In fact, it appears that high level of emotional self-efficacy and emotional intelligence (as a trait) are pivotal to gain higher job responsibilities (in case of managers) and to promote professional and personal developmental processes (in case of the coaches)
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
