1,720,957 research outputs found
Data Quality Dimensions for Fair AI
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are not intrinsically neutral and biases trickle in any type of tech-
nological tool. In particular when dealing with people, the impact of AI algorithms’ technical errors
originating with mislabeled data is undeniable. As they feed wrong and discriminatory classifications,
these systems are not systematically guarded against bias. In this article we consider the problem of
bias in AI systems from the point of view of data quality dimensions. We highlight the limited model
construction of bias mitigation tools based on accuracy strategy, illustrating potential improvements of a
specific tool in gender classification errors occurring in two typically difficult contexts: the classification
of non-binary individuals, for which the label set becomes incomplete with respect to the dataset; and
the classification of transgender individuals, for which the dataset becomes inconsistent with respect
to the label set. Using formal methods for reasoning about the behavior of the classification system in
presence of a changing world, we propose to reconsider the fairness of the classification task in terms of
completeness, consistency, timeliness and reliability, and offer some theoretical results
Down-modulation of Bcl-2 sensitizes PTEN-mutated prostate cancer cells to starvation and taxanes
BACKGROUND:
The critical role of PTEN in regulating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway raises the possibility that targeting downstream effectors of the PI3K pathway, such as Bcl-2, might be an effective anti-proliferative strategy for PTEN-deficient prostate cancer cells.
METHODS:
Four prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, DU145, 22Rv1) were assayed for their levels of total Akt and Ser473 phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) by Western Blotting; their growth rates and sensitivity to different doses of paclitaxel were determined by cell counts after Trypan Blue dye exclusion assay. Cells were subjected to different combinations of starvation (growth factors and/or aminoacids withdrawal), paclitaxel treatment and Bcl-2 silencing by siRNA. Cell viability was evaluated by Trypan Blue dye exclusion assay, Propidium Iodide (PI) and Annexin-V/PI staining.
RESULTS:
We assessed the sensitivity of different prostate cancer cell lines to starvation and we observed a differential response correlated to the levels of Akt activation. The four prostate cancer cell lines also showed different sensitivity to taxol treatments; LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells were more resistant to paclitaxel than DU145 and PC3 cells. Combining taxol with growth factors and aminoacids deprivation leaded to a more than additive reduction of cell viability compared to single treatments in PTEN-mutant LNCaP cells. Down-modulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein by siRNA sensitized LNCaP cells to taxanes and starvation induced cell death.
CONCLUSIONS:
Silencing Bcl-2 in PTEN-mutated prostate cancer cells enhances the apoptotic effects of combined starvation and taxol treatments, indicating that inhibition of Bcl-2 may be of significant value in PTEN-mutant tumor therapy
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
