1,720,964 research outputs found
Paclitaxel plus epirubicin in advanced breast cancer.
This phase I-II study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel (Taxol), infused over 3 hours, when combined with a fixed dose (90 mg/m2) of epirubicin. Other aims were to investigate the combination's plasma pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and activity in 50 patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer, as well as its ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). The initial dose of paclitaxel, 135 mg/m2, was increased by 20 mg/m2 in subsequent cohorts of six patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The DLT of the combination was febrile neutropenia in two of eight patients who received paclitaxel at 225 mg/m2. The concentration of epirubicinol, the major metabolite of epirubicin, decreased from 47.3 +/- 9.4 ng/mL at 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel to 37.9 +/- 7.5 ng/mL at the 225-mg/m2 dose. The most relevant toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia (61\% of all the courses). Cardiac toxicity included three patients (6\%) developing congestive heart failure responsive to therapy. Among 49 evaluable patients, 41 responses (84\%) were observed (95\% confidence interval [CI], 70\% to 92\%) and 9 (19\%) of these were complete. In 21 patients, we evaluated the mobilization of PBSCs after this regimen plus a colony-stimulating factor. The median number of CD34+ cells was 61.7/microL (range, 6.8 to 201/microL), and a median of 6.3 x 10(6)/kg of CD34+ cells have been harvested with a single leukapheresis
The Family Assessment Measure III (FAM III) in an Italian sample. An exploratory study
The Family Assessment Measure III (FAM III; Skinner, Steinhauer & Santa-Barbara, 1995) is one of the
most widely used family assessment tool at the international level. However, research supporting its use in the Italian
context is lacking. In order to help to fill this gap, the main aim of this pilot study was to explore the use of FAM III in the
Italian context. The questionnaire was administered to an Italian community sample of 1572 parents together with the
Parenting Stress Index (PSI-SF; Abidin, 1995), as a measure of parental stress. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were carried
out. The 7-factor model showed the best fit. Internal consistency of FAM III showed acceptable values. Analysis of variance
showed significant differences for age cohorts, few differences for parental role, and no effect for child’s gender. The data
collected for the Italian sample were compared with available data for the American sample showing few differences.
Convergent validity was assessed investigating relationships between the FAM III and PSI-SF. Correlations revealed a good
association between quality of family functioning and parenting stress as referred by parents. The FAM III appears to be a
reliable tool for assessing Italian family functioning in different moments of the family cycle of life
L’affect in Play Scale Preschool Version (Aps-P): Tra Sviluppo e Ambiente Familiare, Comportamento del Bambino e Stile di Parenting Genitoriale
Affect in Play Scale Preschool Version: Child Behavior according to a Developmental Approach and Parenting Style within the Family Environment
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
