1,724,755 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Cyril C. Clark
No full textCyril C. Clark recieves Goddard Award from Wayne Keit
Wholesale price list, fall 1958, spring 1959 : Arnold C. Clark Nursery, Arnold C. Clark, owner, McMinnville, Tennessee
No full text195
Mrs. W. C. Clark
No full textMrs. W. C. Clark, recently elected president of the Tuesday Club, pictured here in a bust shot. Published in Fort Worth Star-Telegram evening edition April 6, 1954https://mavmatrix.uta.edu/specialcollections_startelegram1950s/31409/thumbnail.jp
James C. Clark, U.S. Army Air Corps
No full textThis is a portrait of James C. Clark, U.S. Army Air Forces. He is smiling widely at the camera and wearing his summer service uniform. There is a sign at upper chest level that reads "James C. Clark." This was taken while he was stationed at Selman Field, Louisiana
Portrait of J. C. Clark
No full textPortrait of J.C. Clark. He was likely either a student or professor at Pacific University.[front] J. C. Clark,; [back] J. C. Clar
Charles C. Clark
No full textBorn in 1925, Charles C. Clark frequently visited Palo Alto and attended Palo Alto High School. After settling in Palo Alto, Charles worked in various health service agencies. Charles had been a member of the First Baptist Church of Palo Alto since 1958
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
