34 research outputs found
Modeling the performance of multilayer insulation in cryogenic tanks undergoing external fire scenarios
Multilayer Insulation (MLI) is frequently used in vacuum conditions for the thermal insulation of cryogenic storage tanks. The severe consequences of the degradation of such materials in engulfing fire scenarios were recently evidenced by several large-scale experimental tests. In the present study, an innovative modelling approach was developed to assess the performance of heat transfer in polyester-based MLI materials for cryogenic applications under fire conditions. A specific layer-by-layer approach was integrated with an apparent kinetic thermal degradation model based on thermogravimetric analysis results. The modeling results provided a realistic simulation of the experimental data obtained by High-Temperature Thermal Vacuum Chamber tests reproducing fire exposure conditions. The model was then applied to assess the behavior of MLI systems for liquid hydrogen tanks in realistic fire scenarios. The results show that in intense fire scenarios degradation occurs rapidly, compromising the thermal insulation performances of the system within a few minutes
Plates versus struts versus an extracortical rib fixation in flail chest patients: Two-center experience
Purposes: Notwithstanding advances in medical and surgical management of flail chest, its morbidity and mortality rates are still high. Aim of this study is to compare three approaches for parietal thoracic stabilization by analyzing both early and long-term patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective study from January 2006 to January 2018 involving sixty-five surgical flail chest (25 plates,11 struts and 29 wires fixations) was conducted. A mean Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was 2.38±0.82 and a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 32.02±8.21. Results: Struts and plates stabilizations compared with wires fixation showed an immediate restoring of the partial pressure of oxygen (90.56 mmHg vs 91.90 mmHg vs 89.23 mmHg, p = 0.021), the carbon-dioxide levels (36.00 mmHg vs 35.03 mmHg vs 38.98 mmHg, p = 0.000) and the oxygen-blood saturation (97.71% vs 98.21% vs 92.12%, p = 0.000) in the early postoperative period. Furthermore, struts and plates ensured a better recovery of daily activities up to the 3rdmonth (QoL=1.0: p<0.001 in lateral flail chest and p<0.02 in anterior and antero-lateral flail chest). At the 12thmonth no difference in QoL was found between the different approaches. Conclusions: Plate and strut fixation revealed a lower rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Wires stabilization was characterized for a reduction of operative time
Analysis of high temperature degradation of multi-layer insulation (MLI) systems for liquid hydrogen storage tanks
The interest in hydrogen-based green energy is increasing worldwide, and the same is true for hydrogen-powered vehicles. Among the possible solutions to store hydrogen in such vehicles, cryogenic tanks equipped with multi-layer insulation (MLI) are the most promising to increase the amount of energy stored per unit volume. However, MLI is affected by severe deterioration when exposed to an external source of heat such as a fire following a car accident, leaving the tank unprotected and leading to failure in a relatively short time. In this work, a one-dimensional model to evaluate MLI thermal degradation when a liquid hydrogen tank is exposed to fire is presented. The relevance of taking MLI degradation into account when simulating the pressure increase due to external fire exposure is here demonstrated through the analysis of several case studies. The results show that MLI systems performance depletes within a few minutes of exposure to hydrocarbon poolfire
Fox Products Corporation : a musical miracle in Indiana's farmland : an honors thesis ([HONRS] 499)
There is no abstract available for this thesis.Thesis (B.?.)Honors Colleg
Frequent mutations in the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene family in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung
The neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) family is potentially implicated in tumorigenesis and progression of several neoplastic diseases, including lung cancer. We investigated a large number of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) without morphological evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation for mutations in the NTRK gene family. A total of 538 primary lung carcinomas, including 17 typical carcinoids (TCs), 10 atypical carcinoids (ACs), 39 small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs), 29 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs), and 443 NSCLCs were evaluated by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and sequencing of the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3. The NTRK1 gene was never found to be mutated. A total of 10 somatic mutations were detected in NTRK2 and NTRK3, mostly located in the activating and catalytic loops. NTRK mutations were seen in 9 (10%) out of 95 PNETs but in 0 out of 443 NSCLCs investigated. No mutations were observed in TCs, ACs, and SCLCs. Interestingly, all the mutations were restricted to the LCNEC histotype, in which they accounted for 31% of cases. A mutational analysis, performed after microdissection of LCNECs combined with adenocarcinoma (ADC), showed that only neuroendocrine areas were positive, suggesting that NTRK mutations are involved in the genesis of the neuroendocrine component of combined LCNECs. Our data indicate that somatic mutations in the TKD of NTRK genes are frequent in LCNECs. Such mutational events could represent an important step in the cancerogenesis of these tumors and may have potential implications for the selection o
Erratum: Nodal management and upstaging of disease: Initial results from the Italian VATS Lobectomy Registry [J Thorac Dis, 9, (2017), (2061-2070)] DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.12
In the article that appeared on page 2061-2070, Vol 9, No 7 (July 2017) Issue of the Journal of Thoracic Disease (1), there are some mistakes in the presented authors information. In the list of collaborators of the Italian VATS Group are not included the following author names: Alessandro Bertani, Alessandro Gonfiotti, Mario Nosotti, Paolo Albino Ferrari, Lavinia De Monte, Emanuele Russo, Gioacchino Di Paola, Piergiorgio Solli, Andrea Droghetti, Luca Bertolaccini, Roberto Crisci. The correct list of collaborators of the Italian VATS Group should have been shown as below. Alessandro Bertani, MD (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Alessandro Gonfiotti, MD (Careggi Hospital, Firenze); Mario Nosotti, MD (Policlinico Ca'Granda, Milano); Paolo Albino Ferrari, MD (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Lavinia De Monte, MD (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Emanuele Russo, MD (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Gioacchino Di Paola, MD (IRCCS ISMETT, Palermo); Piergiorgio Solli, MD PhD (AUSL Romagna Teaching Hospital, Forlì); Andrea Droghetti, MD (ASST Mantova-Cremona, Mantova); Luca Bertolaccini, MD PhD (AUSL Romagna Teaching Hospital, Forlì); Roberto Crisci, MD PhD (Università dell'Aquila, L'Aquila); Carlo Curcio, MD (Monaldi Hospital, Napoli); Dario Amore, MD (Monaldi Hospital, Napoli); Giuseppe Marulli, MD (University of Padova); Samuele Nicotra, MD (University of Padova); Andrea De Negri, MD (San Martino Hospital, Genova); Paola Maineri, MD (San Martino Hospital, Genova); Gaetano di Rienzo (Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce); Camillo Lopez, MD (Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce); Angelo Morelli, MD (S. Maria delle Misericordia Hospital, Udine); Francesco Londero, MD (S. Maria delle Misericordia Hospital, Udine); Lorenzo Spaggiari, MD (IEO Hospital, Milano); Roberto Gasparri, MD (IEO Hospital, Milano); Guido Baietto, MD (Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara); Caterina Casadio, MD (Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara); Maurizio Infante, MD (Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona); Cristiano Benato, MD (Borgo Trento Hospital, Verona); Marco Alloisio, MD (IRCCS Humanitas, Milano); Edoardo Bottoni, MD (IRCCS Humanitas, Milano); Giuseppe Cardillo, MD (Forlanini Hospital, Roma); Francesco Carleo, MD (Forlanini Hospital, Roma); Franco Stella, MD (S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna); Giampiero Dolci, MD (S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna); Francesco Puma, MD (University of Perugia); Damiano Vinci, MD (University of Perugia); Giorgio Cavallesco, MD (University of Ferrara); Pio Maniscalco, MD (University of Ferrara); Luca Ampollini, MD (University of Parma); Paolo Carbognani, MD (University of Parma); Alberto Terzi, MD (Negrar Hospital, Verona); Andrea Viti, MD (Negrar Hospital, Verona); Giampiero Negri, MD (S. Raffaele Hospital, Milano); Alessandro Bandiera, MD (S. Raffaele Hospital, Milano); Reinhold Perkmann, MD (Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano); Francesco Zaraca, MD (Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano); Claudio Andretti, MD (S. Andrea Hospital, Roma); Camilla Poggi, MD (S. Andrea Hospital, Roma); Felice Mucilli, MD (S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Chieti); Pierpaolo Camplese, MD (S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Chieti); Luca Luzzi, MD (University of Siena); Marco Ghisalberti, MD (University of Siena); Andrea Imperatori, MD (University of Varese); Nicola Rotolo, MD (University of Varese); Luigi Bortolotti, MD (Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo); Giovanna Rizzardi, MD (Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo); Massimo Torre, MD (Niguarda Hospital, Milano); Alessandro Rinaldo, MD (Niguarda Hospital, Milano); Armando Sabbatini, MD (Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona); Majed Refai, MD (Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona); Mauro Roberto Benvenuti, MD (Spedali Civili, Brescia); Diego Benetti, MD (Spedali Civili, Brescia); Alessandro Stefani, MD (Ospedale Policlinico, Modena); Pamela Natali, MD (Ospedale Policlinico, Modena); Paolo Lausi, MD (Ospedale Molinette, Torino); Francesco Guerrera, MD (Ospedale Molinette, Torino)
Correction to: Predictors of nodal upstaging in patients with cT1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from the Italian VATS Group Registry (Surgery Today, (2020), 50, 7, (711-718), 10.1007/s00595-019-01939-x)
In the original publication, Carlo Curcio was not included in the author list. The correct author list is included in this Correction. Also an Appendix listing VATS author group is included in this correction
Pleurectomy-decortication in malignant pleural mesothelioma: are different surgical techniques associated with different outcomes? Results from a multicentre study.
OBJECTIVES:
The potential benefit of surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), especially concerning pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), is unclear from the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome after multimodality treatment of MPM involving different types of P/D and to analyse the prognostic factors.
METHODS:
We reviewed 314 patients affected by MPM who were operated on in 11 Italian centres from 1 January 2007 to 11 October 2014.
RESULTS:
The characteristics of the population were male/female ratio: 3.7/1, and median age at operation was 67.8 years. The epithelioid histotype was observed in 79.9% of patients; neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 57% of patients and Stage III disease was found following a pathological analysis in 62.3% of cases. A total of 162 (51.6%) patients underwent extended P/D (EP/D); 115 (36.6%) patients had P/D and 37 (11.8%) received only a partial pleurectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered in 39.2% of patients. Median overall survival time after surgery was 23.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.6-29.1] months. On multivariable (Cox) analysis, pathological Stage III-IV [ P = 0.004, hazard ratio (HR):1.34; 95% CI: 1.09-1.64], EP/D and P/D ( P = 0.006, HR for EP/D: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.29-0.74; HR for P/D: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31-0.87), left-sided disease ( P = 0.01, HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.09-2.12) and pathological status T4 ( P = 0.0003, HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.14-1.66) were found to be independent significant predictors of overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS:
Whether the P/D is extended or not, it shows similarly good outcomes in terms of early results and survival rate. In contrast, a partial pleurectomy, which leaves gross tumour behind, has no impact on survival
