1,720,989 research outputs found

    One-stage Penile Urethroplasty Using Oral Mucosal Graft and Glue

    No full text
    Background Repair of penile urethral strictures is a challenging problem for which different techniques have been suggested. Objective To describe a new surgical technique for one-stage penile urethroplasty using an oral graft and glue, and to assess its safety and efficacy. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective review of medical records for patients who underwent one-stage penile urethroplasty using oral mucosa and glue from February 2013 to October 2014 was performed. Surgical procedure The penile urethra was opened and the urethral plate was incised to create a wide window within which the oral graft was pasted with glue. The urethra was sutured over the catheter. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Clinical data were collected in a database. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results and limitations Fourteen patients were included in the study. Median operative time was 60 min. The median postoperative stay was 3 d. Three intraoperative and one postoperative complication occurred. In all patients, voiding cystourethrography 2 wk after surgery failed to show urethral fistula or sacculation. No patients complained of penile chordee or sexual dysfunction after surgery. Median follow-up was 16 mo. Among the 14 patients, 12 (85.7%) procedures were successful and two (14.3%) were failures. Study limitations include the small sample size and short follow-up. Conclusions An in vitro study and a one-stage reconstruction of penile urethral strictures with an oral mucosa graft and glue showed that the procedure is safe and efficient, but further studies including larger series of patients and longer follow-up are required. Patient summary We report on the repair of penile urethral stricture using one-stage urethroplasty with oral mucosa and glue. This new technique was safe and effective, with limited complications and satisfactory outcomes. We plan to increase the use of this technique in the future

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Surgical treatment of bulbar urethral strictures: Tips and tricks

    No full text
    The surgical treatment of bulbar urethral strictures is still one of the most challenging reconstructive-surgery problems. Bulbar urethral strictures are usually categorized as traumatic and non-traumatic strictures depending on the aetiology. The traumatic strictures are caused by trauma and they determine disruption of the urethra with obliteration of the urethral lumen, ending with fibrotic gaps between the urethral ends. Differently, the non-traumatic urethral strictures are mainly caused by catheterization, instrumentation, and infection, or they can also be idiopathic. They are usually associated with spongiofibrosis of the segment of the urethra that has been involved.Worldwide, two different surgical approaches are currently adopted for bulbar urethral repair: transecting techniques with end-to-end anastomosis and non-transecting techniques followed by grafting. Traumatic obliterated strictures require transection of the urethra allowing complete removal of the fibrotic tissue that involves the urethral ends. Conversely, non-traumatic, non-obliterated urethral strictures require augmentation of the urethral plate using oral mucosa grafts.Nowadays, it is still difficult to choose the correct surgical management for non-obliterated bulbar stricture repair. Indeed, different surgical techniques have been proposed (pedicled flap vs free graft, dorsal vs ventral placement of the graft, non-transecting technique using or non-using free graft, etc.) but none emerged as the best solution since all techniques have showed similar success and complication rates. Consequently, the final choice is still based on surgeon's preferences and patient's characteristics. Within the current manuscript, we like to present some of our tips and tricks that we developed along our prolonged surgical experience on the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. These might be of interest for surgeons that approach this complex surgery. Moreover, our suggestions want to be useful regardless the type of chosen technique being adaptable for different scenario

    Correlation Between Primary Hypospadias Repair and Subsequent Urethral Strictures in a Series of 408 Adult Patients

    No full text
    Background The correlation between primary hypospadias repair and subsequent urethral strictures in adults has never been addressed. Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the site of primary hypospadias repair and the site of subsequent strictures and to investigate the predictive factors of failure after urethroplasty. Design, setting, and participants An observational, retrospective, descriptive study of adult patients with urethral strictures following hypospadias surgery was carried out in a single centre. Intervention Meatotomy, meatoplasty, end-to-end anastomosis, urethroplasty, perineostomy, urethrotomy, and fistula closure. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We performed correlations between the site of primary hypospadias and the site of subsequent strictures, treatment failure, and patient lack of motivation for definitive treatment. Cross-tables, Kaplan-Meier curves, and logistic or Cox regression were used. Results and limitations A total of 408 patients, with median follow-up of 96 mo, were included. Concordance between the site of primary hypospadias repair and the site of subsequent strictures was observed. Multivariable analysis revealed that the number of previous operations needed for initial hypospadias repair was not associated with the risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96; 95% confidence Interval [CI] 0.88–1.04; p = 0.3) or a lack of patient motivation (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.90–1.10; p = 0.9). Length of stenosis (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11–1.71; p = 0.004) and lichen sclerosus (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.03–3.25; p = 0.035) were associated with a higher risk of treatment failure. Our study is not representative of the entire population of patients with hypospadias repair. Conclusions The stricture site is usually consistent with the site of hypospadias. Stricture length, but not the number of previous operations needed for primary hypospadias repair, was associated with the risk of failure. Patient summary The number of operations needed for hypospadias repair was not associated with failure of subsequent urethroplasty. Our findings show that the number of previous operations needed for hypospadias repair was not associated with the risk of treatment failure for subsequent strictures

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    Patient-reported outcomes for typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting: a single-center analysis of more than 800 patients

    No full text
    Purpose The optimal harvesting site for oral grafting in patients with urethral strictures remain controversial, with no study investigating morbidity on large scale. We aimed to compare typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting in terms of complications and patient-reported outcomes. Methods Within 827 patients treated at our referral center with oral graft urethroplasty, we compared typical vs atypical harvesting techniques. A self-administered, semiquantitative, non-validated questionnaire assessed early (10 days) and late (4 months) postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes. A semiquantitative score was calculated according to patient responses, and it was used to assess early (6 questions) and late (13 questions) patient dissatisfaction status. Patients were defined early and/or late dissatisfied when they scored >= 7 and >= 10 at the early or late questionnaires, respectively. Results Between 1998 and 2019, our patients predominantly received typical single cheek harvesting (89% vs 11%), with + 1.5% increase rate per year (p < 0.001). Early and late dissatisfied patients were, respectively, 170 (23%) vs 39 (44%) and 59 (8%) vs 16 (18%) in the typical vs atypical groups. Atypical harvesting was associated with higher rates of early (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.34; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.75;p = 0.001) and late (OR: 2.37; 95%CI 1.22-4.42;p = 0.008) postoperative dissatisfaction. Conclusions Typical single cheek harvesting was the preferred surgical option at our center and it was associated with negligible early and late rates of complications and patient's dissatisfaction. Conversely, atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting was associated with higher complications and frequent patient dissatisfaction
    corecore