1,720,973 research outputs found
Day-On, Day-Off emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz single tablet regimen (DODO) as maintenance therapy in HIV-infected patients
No full textReduced dose schedules may be feasible options to simplify antiretroviral therapy (ART) in selected HIV-1-infected individuals. Efficacy and safety of a Day-on, Day-off (DODO) schedule of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine and efavirenz (FTC/TDF/EFV) single tablet regimen (STR) was assessed. Twenty-seven patients were prescribed the DODO schedule and were monitored for 48 weeks. Switching criteria were: no previous ART failure, no AIDS-defining illnesses, T CD4 cell nadir >200/mmc, and HIV-RNA below detection limit (40 copies/mL) for at least six months. Clinical and laboratory data, including plasma HIV-RNA levels, T CD4 and CD8 counts, liver and kidney function, lipid levels and ultrasensitive C-reactive protein (us-CRP) were assessed at baseline, week 4, 12, 24, and 48. Statistical analysis was performed by paired Student's T-test for comparison between baseline and each time point and Chi square test for CD4/CD8 ratio comparison. In all, 26 out of 27 patients maintained plasma HIV-RNA levels below the detection limit through the entire follow-up. One patient experienced low level plasma HIV-RNA rebound at week 36 (47 copies/ml) and immediately reverted to the conventional dose schedule of FTC/TDF/EFV; plasma HIV-RNA was undetectable after four weeks. No major changes on liver and kidney function tests, lipid levels and us-CRP were observed. Although no profound modifications of T CD4 count were observed during follow-up, the CD4/CD8 ratio increased significantly at week 48 compared to the baseline (p<0.05). In conclusion, 48-week DODO administration of the fixed dose FTC/TDF/EFV STR combination was safe and effective in maintaining HIV viral replication below the detection limit in a selected group of HIV-1-infected individuals
The effect of dupilumab in an HBV-HIV coinfected atopic patient: a case report
No full textAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease typical of childhood that can also affect adults. AD is clinically characterized by intensely pruritic eczematous lesions. The burden of this disease and its impact on quality of life are often substantial. Dupilumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin 4 (IL-4) receptor α, capable of blocking IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. This novel therapy represents the first biologic approved for the treatment of moderate to severe AD. Our report describes the case of a 39-year-old adult patient affected by severe chronic AD with associated allergic and viral comorbidities for whom conventional systemic therapies proved ineffective or contraindicated. The main source of interest in this case is hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection because, to our knowledge, this is the first case of
an adult atopic patient treated with dupilumab in the simultaneous presence of these comorbidities. Regarding coinfections, the patient was on antiretroviral therapy for HBV and HIV before starting dupilumab. Efficacy and safety data after 24 weeks of therapy
are reported in detail
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
