1,720,956 research outputs found
Intra and inter-rater reliability of Valedo System to measure trunk range of movement in healthy and chronic stroke participants during the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test
Intra and inter-rater reliability of Valedo System to measure trunk range of movement in healthy and chronic stroke participants during the streamlined Wolf Motor Function TestBusselli G.1, Alhwoaimel N. 2, Warner M. 2, Hughes A.-M. 2, Burridge J. 2, Turk R. 21University of Verona, Verona, Italy2University of Southampton, Southampton, United KingdomQuestion: What is the intra and inter-rater reliability of the Valedo system to measure trunk range of motion (ROM) during performance of streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (SWMFT) in stroke and age-matched healthy participants?Trunk performance has been recognized as an important independent predictor of activities of daily living after a stroke. A recent study by Kwee 2015 showed that the trunk control measured by trunk impairment scale (TIS) is associated with upper limb (UL) function measured by SWMFT in subacute and chronic stroke. To ensure that any planned treatment for strokes is effective, therapists need accurate assessment tools or outcome measures to assess the change in function. The purpose of this study is improve assessment of trunk control in a clinical setting by testing the reliability of using a low cost wearable sensor to measure trunk movement during performance of SWMFT among stroke and age-matched healthy participants.Methods: An observational cross-sectional study is used to establish the reliability of using the Valedo system to measure the trunk ROM in chronic stroke and age-matched healthy participants during performance of six tasks of SWMFT (hand to box, lift can, lift pencil, fold towel, extend elbow weight, turn key in lock). From March to May 2019 a purposive sample of 20 adult chronic stroke participants with UL impairment (mild to moderate) and 20 aged matched healthy participants will be recruited. All participants will attend two assessment sessions seven to ten days apart. In the first session, the SWMFT will be recorded three times (the first and third assessment by assessor 1, the second assessment by assessor 2) with a rest period between them to test for intra and inter-rater reliability. In the second session, the SWMFT data will be recorded once by assessor 1 to assess between sessions reliability.Results: Recorded data will be processed using MATLAB software. Subsequently, the trunk ROM during each task will be calculated. Data will be exported into Excel files and analysed using IBM SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). For test re-test and between session reliability, measurements will be tested using the [ICC 1,1] with 95% confidence interval (CI); for inter-rater reliability, the [ICC 1,3] with 95% confidence interval (CI) will be used. Results will be presented at the conference.Conclusion: Intra and inter-reliability of Valedo system to assess trunk ROM during SWMFT tasks will be established.<br/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Validity and reliability of sensor system to measure trunk range of motion during Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test in chronic stroke and aged-matched healthy participants
To investigate the validity and reliability of using the Valedo® system to measure trunk Range of Motion (ROM) during performance of the streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (SWMFT). Twenty chronic strokes and 20 age-matched healthy participants performed SWMFT while wearing Valedo® sensors on their trunks to capture trunk movements. A paired sample T-test was used to examine the validity of the system in distinguishing between the healthy and stroke group, and between the affected and unaffected sides in the stroke group. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (between-days) with 95% CI. The Valedo® system was able to distinguish between stroke and healthy participants; stroke participants employed greater trunk range of movements than the healthy controls in all tasks (p The Valedo system demonstrates an acceptable level of validity and reliability for measuring trunk ROM during the Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test (SWMFT). Future studies with a larger sample size, different levels of upper limb impairment are warranted.</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
