1,720,971 research outputs found
A pilot study of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in aortic surgery
No full textObjective: We tested the outcomes with the use of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients who had undergone open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (enhanced recovery after vascular surgery [ERAVS] protocol). We compared them with those obtained for patients who had undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and for a historical control group of standard open AAA repair in a prospective, single-center pilot study.
Methods: From June to December 2019, all patients who were candidates for open AAA repair at our department were enrolled in the ERAVS protocol (ERAVS group; 17 patients). During the same period, 18 patients had undergone EVAR (EVAR group). The historical control group of standard open AAA repair included 32 patients who had undergone surgery during the 6 months before the study period (standard protocol open repair [OR] group). The three groups were compared on an "on-treatment" basis (prospectively for the ERAVS and EVAR groups and retrospectively for the OR group) in terms of the time to discharge (TTD), interval to the resumption of oral intake, time to ambulation, resumption of bowel function, and postoperative pain. Comparisons were performed using the one-way analysis of variance test, Tukey post hoc test for quantitative data, and χ2 test for qualitative data.
Results: The ERAVS protocol was successfully applied for all but one patient (feasibility rate, 94%). The mean TTD was 5.1 days in the ERAVS group, 3.5 days in the EVAR group, and 8.4 days in the OR group [P < .001; F(2,64) = 11.3], with a significant difference between the OR and ERAVS and EVAR groups (P = .1 and P < .001, respectively) but not between the EVAR and ERAVS groups (P = .4). The ERAVS group had intervals to the resumption of oral intake and ambulation similar to those of the EVAR group. In contrast, these were significantly longer for the OR group. The mean time to the resumption of bowel function was similar in the ERAVS and OR groups (2.6 and 2.9 days, respectively; P = .6). In the ERAVS group, the mean value of the maximum referred pain using the numeric rating scale was 3.75 (range, 1-6). The corresponding values for the EVAR and OR groups were 2.6 (range, 0-6) and 4.9 [range, 1-8; F(2,62) = 15.4; P < .001]. The post hoc test showed a significant difference between the OR group and the ERAVS and EVAR group (P = .01 and P < .001, respectively) but not between the ERAVS and EVAR groups (P = .07).
Conclusions: In our early experience, the ERAVS protocol appeared to be effective in reducing the TTD and improving the postoperative outcomes compared with the OR group, without significant differences compared with the EVAR group
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in "Shaggy Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms"
No full textObjectives: To report the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for shaggy thoracic aortic aneurysms (STA).
Methods: It is a single center, retrospective, observational, cohort study. Data were collected prospectively between January 2005 and May 2019. STA was defined, based on computed tomography angiography findings, as the presence of an irregular/ulcerated atheroma protruding and/or thrombus thickness ≥ 5 mm protruding into the aortic lumen, and/or occupying more than two thirds of the circumference of the aortic diameter axially. Primary outcomes were early (≤ 30 days) and late survival and freedom from major complication due to end-organ or peripheral ischemic embolization.
Results: Nine (2.3%) of 391 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 71 years ± 10 (range 55-83). Mean aneurysm diameter was 68 mm ± 0.5 (range 60-75). Four patients presented symptomatic: rupture (n = 2), blue toe syndrome (n = 2). TEVAR was performed in 7 of the 9 patients. Operative-related embolization occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack and acute kidney injury). In-hospital mortality was observed in 1 patient following spinal cord ischemia and multiple organ failure development. Median follow-up was 48 months (IQR 5-84). Freedom from major complication due to end-organ or peripheral ischemic embolization was achieved in all patients. No patient developed further localization of STA in the proximal or distal aorta, and did not experience reno-visceral or peripheral atheroembolization episodes.
Conclusions: Risk of atheroembolism in STA is still threatening but TEVAR proved to be an effective and durable treatment in this high-risk cohort
To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textIntroduction: A postoperative neck hematoma can be a life-threatening complication after carotid endarterectomy necessitating urgent surgical decompression to avoid airway compromise. The practice of routine incisional drain placement is variable with few published studies evaluating the "to drain versus not to drain" approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of neck drain placement for prevention of neck hematoma requiring re-exploration for decompression.
Evidence acquisition: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcome of surgical re-exploration for neck decompression among patients receiving or not receiving wound drainage.
Evidence synthesis: We identified 5 studies for inclusion, comprising 48,297 patients with 19,832 (41.1%) patients receiving a drain after carotid endarterectomy. Patients in the drain group had a significantly higher re-exploration rate after carotid endarterectomy compared to those who did not receive a drainage (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.49; P=0.02) with no heterogeneity (I2=0%).
Conclusions: Routine drain placement does not offer complete protection against neck hematoma development and may give the surgeon a false sense of security in wound drainage. Thus, we conclude that drain placement following carotid endarterectomy should be selective, not routine
A predictive score for 30-day survival for patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial obstructive disease
Full text linkTo analyze outcomes following major lower extremity amputations (mLEAs) for peripheral arterial obstructive disease, gangrene, infected non-healing wound and to create a risk prediction scoring system for 30-day mortality. In this single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. All patients treated with above-the-knee amputation (AKA) or below-the-knee amputation (BKA) between January 1st, 2010 and June 30th, 2018 were identified. The primary outcome of interest was early (≤ 30 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and freedom from amputation stump revision/failure. We identified 310 (77.7%) mLEAs performed on 286 patients. There were 188 (65.7%) men and 98 (34.3%) women with a median age of 79 years (IQR, 69-83 years). We performed 257 (82.9%) AKA and 53 (17.1%) BKA. There were 49 (15.8%) early deaths, which did not differ among the age quartiles of this cohort (15.4% vs. 14.3% vs. 15.4% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.826). Binary logistic regression analysis identified age > 80 years (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.17-4.31; P = 0.015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.11-4.06; P = 0.023), and hemodialysis (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.52; P = 0.021) to be associated with early mortality. The final score (range 0-10) identified two subgroups with different mortality at 30 days: lower-risk (score < 4, 10.8%), and higher-risk (score ≥ 4: 28.7%; OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.63-6.32; P < 0.001). In our experience, mLEAs still have a 14% mortality rate over the years. Our lower-risk group (score < 4) is characterized by a lower rate of perioperative death and longer survival
Risk factors for saphenous vein recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation
No full textIntroduction: Target vein recanalization is defined as the postoperative detection of blood flow in a venous segment previously ablated. It can be occurred after thermal-tumescent procedures, as radiofrequency (RFA) and endovenous laser (EVLA) ablation techniques. Despite several papers described and analyzed incidence and consequences of recanalization, limited data are published on risk factors for this condition. The aim of this general review is to investigate clinical and instrumental risk factors for great and small saphenous veins recanalization after RFA, indicating their impact in the follow-up period.
Evidence acquisition: Articles were obtained through a detailed search of the scientific journal databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) for those published between January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020. The term "radiofrequency venous ablation" was combined with "risk factors", "recanalization" and "recurrence", to obtain the first article cluster.
Evidence synthesis: Risk factors analysis for saphenous vein recanalization after ablation is not a well-studied problem. Although several studies have analyzed recanalization patterns and anatomical causes of ablation failure, few and disaggregate data are available regarding clinical preoperative risk factors. BMI and saphenous trunk diameter seem to be the only two recognized characteristics that may affect short and long-term recanalization rate, though CVI status, sex, target vein treatment length and others factors may be taken into account.
Conclusions: Physicians should consider risk factors for recanalization in patient selection and treatment recommendations, but also recognize that not all "ablation failures" are of clinical relevance
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
