125,324 research outputs found
S1 BUSCO Analyses Results -
No full textContains: Table_A.xlsx, Table_B.csv. A: Table_A.xlsx: lists the BUSCO results from the different transcriptome assemblies by method used. B: Table_B.csv: lists the BUSCO results for the different versions of BUSCO insect e.g. 2, V4 and the associate percentages for single copy complete, complete and duplicated, fragmented and missing genes. (ZIP)</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Supplementary Table S3. BUSCO analysis for B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10
No full textSupplementary Table S3. BUSCO analysis for B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.1
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Supplementary Figure S3. BUSCO-analysis
No full textSupplementary Figure S3. BUSCO-analysis of assembly completeness for C. briggsae, C. elegans, C. remanei genomes with (A) Metazoa database od9 and (B) Nematoda database od9
BUSCO Assessment results.
No full textSummary plot depicting BUSCO results for the 89 Canadian assemblies generated in this study. Based on the 255 single-copy orthologs from the eukaryotic ortholog database [version 10], the percent of complete and fragmented genes [blue and yellow portions of the bars] conserved across Giardia assemblage A and B ranged from 25 to 30% across all assemblies. Red portion of the bar represents missingness. (TIF)</p
Active Filtering of Low Frequency Harmonics in DC/DC Converters for Traction Applications
No full text
Active Filtering for low frequency harmonics in DC/DC converters for traction applications
No full textDigital Control and Simulation for Power Electronic Apparatus in Dual Voltage Railway Locomotive
No full text- …
