1,721,064 research outputs found
Annotation and More Annotation: Some Problems Posed by (and to) Val Tannen
Full text linkAmong the many research accomplishments of Val Tannen, his work on provenance and semirings is probably the most widely known. In this paper, we discuss questions that arise when applying this general framework to the setting of curated databases, and in particular the setting where we can have multiple annotations on the same data, as well as annotations on annotations
Provenance Composition in PROV
Full text linkWhen two communicating processes each record their own provenance,what extra information needs to be recorded in order that a satisfactoryaccount can be given, of the combined process? We propose a setof requirements on (i) the kind of information that the processes can shareand (ii) the kind of queries that should be answerable from the combinedprovenance graph. We describe a solution using PROV
Provenance Management in Curated Databases
Full text linkCurated databases in bioinformatics and other disciplines are the result of a great deal of manual annotation, correction and transfer of data from other sources. Provenance information concerning the creation, attribution, or version history of such data is crucial for assessing its integrity and scientific value. General purpose database systems provide little support for tracking provenance, especially when data moves among databases. This paper investigates general-purpose techniques for recording provenance for data that is copied among databases. We describe an approach in which we track the user's actions while browsing source databases and copying data into a curated database, in order to record the user's actions in a convenient, queryable form. We present an implementation of this technique and use it to evaluate the feasibility of database support for provenance management. Our experiments show that although the overhead of a na ve approach is fairly high, it can be decreased to an acceptable level using simple optimizations
Data citation and the citation graph
Full text linkThe citation graph is a computational artifact that is widely used to represent the domain of published literature. It represents connections between published works, such as citations and authorship. Among other things, the graph supports the computation of bibliometric measures such as h-indexes and impact factors. There is now an increasing demand that we should treat the publication of data in the same way that we treat conventional publications. In particular, we should cite data for the same reasons that we cite other publications.In this paper we discuss what is needed for the citation graph to represent data citation. We identify two challenges: (i) to model the evolution of credit appropriately (through references) over time and (ii) to model data citation not only to a dataset treated as a single object but also to parts of it. We describe an extension of the current citation graph model that addresses these challenges. It is built on two central concepts: citable units and reference subsumption. We discuss how this extension would enable data citation to be represented within the citation graph and how it allows for improvements in current practices for bibliometric computations both for scientific publications and for data.<br/
A Provenance Model for Manually Curated Data
Full text linkMany curated databases are constructed by scientists integrating various existing data sources. Most current approaches to provenance in databases are based on views and fail to take account of the added value of the work done by scientists in manually creating and modifying data. Capturing provenance in such an environment is a challenging problem, requiring changes in practice, changes to existing software, and crucially, a good model of the process of curation.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
