1,720,987 research outputs found
Couples homosexuels et familles homoparentales. Défis, ressources et perspectives pour la thérapie systémique.
GBT couples and families have been often ignored by family and couple therapy. This silence is maintened by heterocentrism that influenced the definition of couple, family and family relations as well as their "normality" vs. "pathology". Whether we are a researcher or clinician, it is interesting to consider the impact of homophobia, heterosexism, heteronormativity in the lives of these couples, families and children. Especially in the clinical consultation, it seems important to assess the degree of stress, ambiguity relational homonegativite of internalized and social support. We will consider also the strengths and limitations of the major models of couples therapy and family therapy work as well as the need to consider the tracks in the future therapist training on LGBT issues. Training could be based on the model of diversity as an inclusive model of family differences
How to work with new families? The contribution of the LTP and PNG in interactional researches and clinical contexts with lesbian-headed and divorced families.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
« De la déviance à la variance » : une brève histoire de la recherche sur les foyers post-divorce
peer reviewe
Pertes et Reconstructions Identitaires des Foyers Post-Divorce
La présente étude s’intéresse au parcours des foyers post-divorce via deux objectifs. Premièrement, nous voulons mettre en avant les éléments organisateurs permettant à ces foyers de passer d’un état à un autre. Pour ce faire, nous recourons à la méthode par théorisation ancrée, bien qu’en nous en écartant partiellement. Deuxièmement, nous cherchons à savoir quels sont les champs lexicaux qui peuvent être extraits des transcriptions d’entretiens avec ces foyers. Pour ce second objectif, nous recourons à la méthode Alceste, via le logiciel Iramuteq. Celui-ci nous permet un croisement des données d’entretiens avec des métadonnées issues notamment du FACES-III et du Jeu du Pique-Nique. Tous ces éléments sont discutés au regard des apports de la littérature scientifique. Mais aussi, au regard de la clinique du deuil, à laquelle il est fait appel pour éclairer ces parcours. En outre, nous contextualisons les notions de famille, mariage et divorce dans une perspective historique prenant ses bases au Moyen Âge
Parcours de vie des foyers monoparentaux et recomposés
Bien qu'ils ont toujours existé, les foyers monoparentaux et recomposés d'aujourd'hui ne sont peut être plus tout à fait les mêmes que ceux d'hier. Jetant un premier regard dans le rétroviseur, nous essayerons de comprendre comment les familles et les psychologues ont fait face à tout ces changements. Regardant alors devant nous, nous tenterons de répondre à un enjeu fondamental de notre temps: la compréhension du parcours de vie de ces foyers depuis la séparation... jusqu'au bien être retrouvé
- …
