1,720,960 research outputs found
Corn
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Bull, C.P.. (1915). Corn. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/184108
Ear Type Selection and Yield in Corn
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Olson, P. J.; Bull, C.P.; Hayes, H.K.. (1918). Ear Type Selection and Yield in Corn. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/184097
Corn breeding in Minnesota
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Bull, C.P.; University of Minnesota. Agricultural Division. (1908). Corn breeding in Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183851
Rural School Agriculture. Bulletin no.2. Revised.
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from the University of Minnesota Extension: https://www.extension.umn.edu.University of Minnesota, Department of Agriculture; Bull, C.P.. (1907). Rural School Agriculture. Bulletin no.2. Revised.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/177289
Sorghum and sorghum sirup manufacture
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Willaman, J. J.; West, R. M.; Bull, C.P.. (1919). Sorghum and sorghum sirup manufacture. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/184122
Barley Investigations
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Bull, C.P.; University of Minnesota. Agricultural Experiment Station. Agronomy and Farm Management Division. (1915). Barley Investigations. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183988
Seed grain: selection, treatment, varieties, distribution
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Boss, Andrew; Bassett, Louis B.; Bull, C.P.; Cooper, T.P.; University of Minnesota. Agricultural Division. (1909). Seed grain: selection, treatment, varieties, distribution. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183859
Tobacco-Growing In Minnesota
No full textThis archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/Bull, C.P.; University of Minnesota. Agricultural Experiment Station. Agronomy and Farm Management Division. (1915). Tobacco-Growing In Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/183989
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
