1,720,973 research outputs found
How the functional assessment of culprit and non-culprit lesions may improve stratification and treatment of STEMI patients
No full textReperfusion therapy of the infarct-related artery (IRA) with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the cornerstone for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, up to 30% of STEMI patients present a multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Several methods are now available for the assessment of functional severity of a coronary stenosis both for IRA and non-culprit coronary lesions. The functional assessment of the IRA has mainly a prognostic implication in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events, recovery of left ventricular function and evaluation myocardial viability. Conversely, the functional assessment of the non-culprit coronary lesions has a fundamental role to guide staged revascularization. The aim of this review is to revise the most validated methods to perform the functional assessment of both culprit and non-culprit lesion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Strategie di rivascolarizzazione coronarica nel paziente con infarto miocardico acuto con sopraslivellamento del tratto ST e malattia multivasale
No full textForty to 60% of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients present with multivessel coronary artery disease, identified during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) of the culprit lesion. At present, data about revascularization of non-culprit coronary lesions are conflicting. Nevertheless, patients with multivessel coronary artery disease have a worse outcome. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses compared a strategy of culprit-only revascularization vs complete revascularization (during pPCI or staged PCI of the non-culprit lesion). The majority of data show a potential benefit of complete revascularization, in particular a reduction in the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, in absence of certain data regarding long-term mortality and reinfarction. Besides, it is still controversial the optimal timing of complete revascularization (during pPCI or staged PCI), as well as the best method for evaluating the lesions to be t...Forty to 60% of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients present with multivessel coronary artery disease, identified during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) of the culprit lesion. At present, data about revascularization of non-culprit coronary lesions are conflicting. Nevertheless, patients with multivessel coronary artery disease have a worse outcome. Recently, several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses compared a strategy of culprit-only revascularization vs complete revascularization (during pPCI or staged PCI of the non-culprit lesion). The majority of data show a potential benefit of complete revascularization, in particular a reduction in the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events, in absence of certain data regarding long-term mortality and reinfarction. Besides, it is still controversial the optimal timing of complete revascularization (during pPCI or staged PCI), as well as the best method for evaluating the lesions to be treated (angiographic vs functional assessment of ischemia). Considering all these data, the only tested and safe approach to treat multivessel coronary artery disease patients remains optimization of medical therapy with long-term prescription of newer antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor and prasugrel) and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy (LDL <70 mg/dl). At the same time, a complete coronary revascularization strategy with PCI, especially guided by ischemia and based on patient lesions and comorbidity, may further improve outcomes
BRS implantation in long lesions requiring device overlapping: myth or reality?
No full textDealing with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implantation in long lesions requiring device overlapping in this particular moment might seem a little provocative for several reasons. First, most studies testing BVS have focused on their safety and efficacy profile in simple patients with simple lesions. Second, ABSORB II did not meet its primary endpoint, while ABSORB III showed a higher rate of target vesselmyocardial infarction (TV-MI) at 2 years. Third, data on porcine model showed that overlapping zone has delayed but greater neointimal proliferation with consequent higher risk for scaffold thrombosis in the shortterm and of in-scaffold restenosis in the long-term. Fourth, recently published data showed higher risk of TVF in patients treated with â¥60 mm BVS. Given all these premises, it may seem right to put aside this technology, while it may seem inappropriate to hypothesize the use of BVS in long lesions. The aim of the present review is precisely to critically review the available evidences regarding BVS with particular regard to overlapping BVS in order to understand whether this technology has a future per se and especially in long coronary lesions requiring overlap
Mid-term and long-term mortality associated with heart failure in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes
No full textEffectiveness and safety of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold for the treatment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
No full textBackground: In the last years bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) become a new therapeutic option for interventional cardiologists, with the advantage of a scaffold inducing a possible vessel wall restoration. Nevertheless, several trials tried to prove the safety and efficacy profile of scaffolds, but with conflicting results. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The search was carried out in PubMed, Google Scholar, Biomed Central and Cochrane Library between January and March 2017. Inclusion criteria: randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the Absorb BVS versus durable polymer cobalt-chromium Everolimus Eluting Stent. The outcomes analysed were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion failure (TLF)/device oriented composite endpoints (DOCE), and device thrombosis. Fixed-effect meta-analysis was performed. Data were expressed as odds ratio (OR). Results: Overall 5,674 patients were included (mean age 62.2±1.31 in drug eluting stents (DES) group vs. 62±1,47 in BVS group; P=0.942). DOCE (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.90-1.48; P=0.259, I2=0%), cardiac death (OR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.52-1.40; P=0.537, I2=0%) and all-cause death (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.53-1.15; P=0.205, I2=15%) did not differ between BVS and DES. Conversely, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization was more frequent in the BVS group (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.73; P=0.039, I2=0%), as well as device thrombosis (2.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.71-5.05, P=0.0001, I2=0%) and target-vessel MI (5.4% vs. 3%, OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.25-2.21, P=0.001, I2=0%). Conclusions: The implantation of BVS is associated with an increased risk of device thrombosis, ischemiadriven target lesion revascularization and target vessel MI. If longer follow-up or different implantation technique may change these findings should be addressed in future trials
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
