1,720,958 research outputs found
Attention-Based Deep Learning Framework for Human Activity Recognition with User Adaptation
No full textSensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) requires to predict the action of a person based on sensor-generated time series data. HAR has attracted major interest in the past few years, thanks to the large number of applications enabled by modern ubiquitous computing devices. While several techniques based on hand-crafted feature engineering have been proposed, the current state-of-the-art is represented by deep learning architectures that automatically obtain high level representations and that use recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to extract temporal dependencies in the input. RNNs have several limitations, in particular in dealing with long-term dependencies. We propose a novel deep learning framework, TrASenD, based on a purely attention-based mechanism, that overcomes the limitations of the state-of-the-art. We show that our proposed attention-based architecture is considerably more powerful than previous approaches, with an average increment, of more than 7% on the F1 score over the previous best performing model. Furthermore, we consider the problem of personalizing HAR deep learning models, which is of great importance in several applications. We propose a simple and effective transfer-learning based strategy to adapt a model to a specific user, providing an average increment of 6% on the F1 score on the predictions for that user. Our extensive experimental evaluation proves the significantly superior capabilities of our proposed framework over the current state-of-the-art and the effectiveness of our user adaptation technique
SizeShiftReg: a Regularization Method for Improving Size-Generalization in Graph Neural Networks
Full text linkIn the past few years, graph neural networks (GNNs) have become the de facto model of choice for graph classification. While, from the theoretical viewpoint, most GNNs can operate on graphs of any size, it is empirically observed that their classification performance degrades when they are applied on graphs with sizes that differ from those in the training data. Previous works have tried to tackle this issue in graph classification by providing the model with inductive biases derived from assumptions on the generative process of the graphs, or by requiring access to graphs from the test domain. The first strategy is tied to the quality of the assumptions made for the generative process, and requires the use of specific models designed after the explicit definition of the generative process of the data, leaving open the question of how to improve the performance of generic GNN models in general settings. On the other hand, the second strategy can be applied to any GNN, but requires access to information that is not always easy to obtain. In this work we consider the scenario in which we only have access to the training data, and we propose a regularization strategy that can be applied to any GNN to improve its generalization capabilities from smaller to larger graphs without requiring access to the test data. Our regularization is based on the idea of simulating a shift in the size of the training graphs using coarsening techniques, and enforcing the model to be robust to such a shift. Experimental results on standard datasets show that popular GNN models, trained on the 50% smallest graphs in the dataset and tested on the 10% largest graphs, obtain performance improvements of up to 30% when trained with our regularization strategy
Graph Representation Learning for Multi-Task Settings: a Meta-Learning Approach
Full text linkGraph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become the state-of-the-art method for many
applications on graph structured data. GNNs are a model for graph
representation learning, which aims at learning to generate low dimensional
node embeddings that encapsulate structural and feature-related information.
GNNs are usually trained in an end-to-end fashion, leading to highly
specialized node embeddings. While this approach achieves great results in the
single-task setting, the generation of node embeddings that can be used to
perform multiple tasks (with performance comparable to single-task models) is
still an open problem. We propose the use of meta-learning to allow the
training of a GNN model capable of producing multi-task node embeddings. In
particular, we exploit the properties of optimization-based meta-learning to
learn GNNs that can produce general node representations by learning parameters
that can quickly (i.e. with a few steps of gradient descent) adapt to multiple
tasks. Our experiments show that the embeddings produced by a model trained
with our purposely designed meta-learning procedure can be used to perform
multiple tasks with comparable or, surprisingly, even higher performance than
both single-task and multi-task end-to-end models.Comment: Accepted as Oral at IJCNN 2022. arXiv admin note: substantial text
overlap with arXiv:2012.0675
The Impact of Global Structural Information in Graph Neural Networks Applications
Full text linkGraph Neural Networks (GNNs) rely on the graph structure to define an aggregation strategy where each node updates its representation by combining information from its neighbours. A known limitation of GNNs is that, as the number of layers increases, information gets smoothed and squashed and node embeddings become indistinguishable, negatively affecting performance. Therefore, practical GNN models employ few layers and only leverage the graph structure in terms of limited, small neighbourhoods around each node. Inevitably, practical GNNs do not capture information depending on the global structure of the graph. While there have been several works studying the limitations and expressivity of GNNs, the question of whether practical applications on graph structured data require global structural knowledge or not remains unanswered. In this work, we empirically address this question by giving access to global information to several GNN models, and observing the impact it has on downstream performance. Our results show that global information can in fact provide significant benefits for common graph-related tasks. We further identify a novel regularization strategy that leads to an average accuracy improvement of more than 5% on all considered tasks
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Extending Logic Explained Networks to Text Classification
Full text linkRecently, Logic Explained Networks (LENs) have been proposed as explainable-by-design neural models providing logic explanations for their predictions. However, these models have only been applied to vision and tabular data, and they mostly favour the generation of global explanations, while local ones tend to be noisy and verbose. For these reasons, we propose LENp, improving local explanations by perturbing input words, and we test it on text classification. Our results show that (i) LENp provides better local explanations than LIME in terms of sensitivity and faithfulness, and (ii) logic explanations are more useful and user-friendly than feature scoring provided by LIME as attested by a human survey
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
