1,721,098 research outputs found

    Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Bruno Frey

    No full text
    BRIEF VON KURT ROTHSCHILD AN BRUNO FREY Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Bruno Frey ([1]

    Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild

    No full text
    BRIEF VON BRUNO FREY AN KURT ROTHSCHILD Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild ([1]

    Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild

    No full text
    BRIEF VON BRUNO FREY AN KURT ROTHSCHILD Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild ([1]

    Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild

    No full text
    BRIEF VON BRUNO FREY AN KURT ROTHSCHILD Brief von Bruno Frey an Kurt Rothschild ([1]

    Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Bruno Frey

    No full text
    BRIEF VON KURT ROTHSCHILD AN BRUNO FREY Brief von Kurt Rothschild an Bruno Frey ([1]

    Eigenplagiate: Der Fall des Ökonomen Bruno Frey

    No full text
    Der Zürcher Ökonom hat parallel Arbeiten bei verschiedenen Fachzeitschriften eingereicht, ohne diese zu zitieren. Anfang Juli nahm die Universität Zürich eine offizielle Untersuchung der Vorwürfe auf. http://blog.handelsblatt.com/handelsblog/2011/07/04/sitzt-bruno-frey-auf-der-titanic http://blog.handelsblatt.com/handelsblog/tag/eigenplagiate In seiner Replik auf die Anschuldigungen findet es Frey alles andere als zwingend, eine parallele ältere Studie zum Titanic-Untergang anderer Autoren zu..

    Werner Pommerehne et Bruno Frey, La culture a-t-elle un prix ?

    No full text
    Sagot-Duvauroux Dominique. Werner Pommerehne et Bruno Frey, La culture a-t-elle un prix ?. In: Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 48ᵉ année, N. 6, 1993. pp. 1645-1648

    The Voter in the House of Mirrors: Comment on “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future” by Bruno Frey

    No full text
    In this note, I discuss the paper “Proposal for a democracy of the future” of Bruno Frey. I focus on some critical issues, and point to further potential applications of Frey’s ideas

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore