1,721,105 research outputs found

    Représentations de l'efficacité chez des cadres supérieurs d'une institution universitaire

    No full text
    Effectuée auprès des cadres supérieurs d'une multi-université, cette recherche met en évidence leurs représentations de l'efficacité de l'institution universitaire et, de façon plus spécifique, leurs critères pour juger de cette efficacité. De plus, l'étude identifie les approches causales qu'ils privilégient pour corriger les écarts d'efficacité jugés inacceptables. Finalement, leur modèle diagnostique implicite et ses conséquences potentielles sur le devenir de l'université sont discutés.Savoie André, Brunet Luc. Représentations de l'efficacité chez des cadres supérieurs d'une institution universitaire. In: Politiques et management public, vol. 12, n° 2, 1994. Administrer les savoirs : leur production, leur transmission, leur application, leur contrôle - Actes du Sixième Colloque International, Genève - 25/26 mars 1993. pp. 175-186

    Consensus-Based Auction Approaches for Decentralized Task Assignment

    Get PDF
    This work is funded in part by AFOSR STTR # FA9550-06-C-0088 (with Dr. Jim Paduano at Aurora Flight Sciences) and by AFOSR # FA9550-08-1-0086. The authors thank Dr. Mehdi Alighanbari for his invaluable contribution in development of the precursors to the consensus-based auction algorithm

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Consensus-Based Decentralized Auctions for Robust Task Allocation

    No full text
    This paper addresses task allocation to coordinate a fleet of autonomous vehicles by presenting two decentralized algorithms: the consensus-based auction algorithm (CBAA) and its generalization to the multi-assignment problem, i.e., the consensus-based bundle algorithm (CBBA). These algorithms utilize a market-based decision strategy as the mechanism for decentralized task selection and use a consensus routine based on local communication as the conflict resolution mechanism to achieve agreement on the winning bid values. Under reasonable assumptions on the scoring scheme, both of the proposed algorithms are proven to guarantee convergence to a conflict-free assignment, and it is shown that the converged solutions exhibit provable worst-case performance. It is also demonstrated that CBAA and CBBA produce conflict-free feasible solutions that are robust to both inconsistencies in the situational awareness across the fleet and variations in the communication network topology. Numerical experiments confirm superior convergence properties and performance when compared with existing auction-based task-allocation algorithms.United States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Grant FA9550-08-1-0086)United States. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Small Business Technology Transfer (Contract FA9550-06-C-0088
    corecore