1,721,106 research outputs found
Commercial systems for fluconazole susceptibility testing of yeasts : comparison with the broth microdilution method
No full textFluconazole susceptibility was tested in 100 clinical yeast isolates (65 Candida albicans, 13 C. glabrata, 8 C. tropicalis, 7 C. parapsilosis, 3 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 1 each of C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, Cryptococcus neoformans, Rhodotorula glutinis) and two control strains (Candida krusei ATCC 6258, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019) using broth microdilution (reference method), disk diffusion, Etest strips, Sensititre YeastOne, Candifast, Integral System Yeasts. Using M27-A breakpoints, isolates were classified as susceptible (81%), susceptible-dose dependent or Resistant with broth dilution. Rates of concordance with the reference method were good for Sensititre YeastOne, Etest and disc-diffusion (81.2%-94.7%) but very low for the Candifast (3.1%) and Integral System (16.6%), which classified most susceptible isolates as resistant. Lack of standardisation (inoculum, medium composition) and non-objective interpretation schemes may be the cause of their poor performance. Sensititre YeastOne, Etest and disc-diffusion are potentially useful for fluconazole antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in clinical laboratories
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
A note of thanks
No full textThe editors-in-chief, editors, members of the editorial board and publisher of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health wish to express their sincere gratitude to the referees of the articles considered for the 2013 volume of the Journal.
Giuseppe Arbia
Fabio Barbone
Joana Bastos
Stefania Boccia
Anna Bossi
Silvio Brusaferro
Chiara Cadeddu
Caterina Caminiti
Giovanni Capelli
Guido Citoni
Gianfranco Damiani
Antonio De Belvis
Emma De Feo
Elisabetta De Vito
Chiara de Waure
Domitilla Di Thiene
Ana Duarte
Bruno Federico
Monica Ferraroni
Alessandra Frustaci
Carlotta Galeone
Silvano Gallus
Maurizio Genuardi
Guglielmo Giraldi
Maria Rosaria Gualano
Carolina Ianuale
Farhad Islami
Giuseppe La Torre
Patrizia Laurenti
Laura Lauria
Carlo La Vecchia
Emanuele Leoncini
Alice Mannocci
Walter Mazzucco
Silvia Miccoli
Cristina Montomoli
Eva Negri
Nicola Nicolotti
Caterina Palazzo
GianCarlo Paradisi
Patrizio Pasqualetti
Claudio Pelucchi
Brunella Posteraro
Delphine Praud
Gianluigi Quaranta
Luca Sbrogiò
Benedetto Simone
Giuliana Solinas
Maria Lucia Specchia
Annamaria Tortorano
Fabio Turone
Brigid Unim
Maria Assunta Veneziano
Francesco Vitale
Antonella Zambon
Alessandro Zanetti
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
