1,721,043 research outputs found
Bruce G. Trigger, A History of Archaeological Thought
No full textRaepsaet Georges. Bruce G. Trigger, A History of Archaeological Thought. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 60, 1991. p. 626
Bruce G. Trigger & Wilcomb W. Washburn, eds. The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Vol. I, part 1 & 2
No full textDelanoë Nelcya. Bruce G. Trigger & Wilcomb W. Washburn, eds. The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Vol. I, part 1 & 2. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°74, octobre 1997. Enseignement primaire et secondaire aux Etats-Unis. pp. 112-114
Bruce G. Trigger & Wilcomb W. Washburn, eds. The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Vol. I, part 1 & 2
No full textDelanoë Nelcya. Bruce G. Trigger & Wilcomb W. Washburn, eds. The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas. Vol. I, part 1 & 2. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°74, octobre 1997. Enseignement primaire et secondaire aux Etats-Unis. pp. 112-114
Trigger (Bruce G.) : Les Indiens, la fourrure et les Blancs, Français et Amérindiens en Amérique du Nord, trad. Georges Khal ; Sioui (Georges E.) : Pour une autohistoire amérindienne. Essai sur les fondements d'une morale sociale, préface de Bruce G. Trigger
No full textDickason Olive Patricia. Trigger (Bruce G.) : Les Indiens, la fourrure et les Blancs, Français et Amérindiens en Amérique du Nord, trad. Georges Khal ; Sioui (Georges E.) : Pour une autohistoire amérindienne. Essai sur les fondements d'une morale sociale, préface de Bruce G. Trigger. In: Revue française d'histoire d'outre-mer, tome 79, n°295, 2e trimestre 1992. pp. 284-286
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Colonial Indology: Sociopolitics of the Ancient Indian Past, by Dilip K. Chakrabarti, Munshiram Manoharial Publishers, New Dehli, India, 1997
No full textColonial Indology is the first extended critique of the
premises underlying the Western study of ancient Indian history and archaeology and, as
such, fills a major gap in the history of archaeology. It complements Ronald Inden's
Imagining India (1390), a general critique of Western Indological scholarship, which
asserts that it has portrayed India in terms of static essences in a way that minimizes
the creativity of the Indian people. Colonial Indology 's author, the
renowned Indian archaeologist Dilip Chakrabarti, who has long been interested in the
history of archaeology in his homeland, argues that views of Indian history that were
created to serve the interests of Western colonialism are still accepted not only by
Western scholars but also by many prominent Indian archaeologists who wish to associate
themselves with the international archaeological community, as well as by India's
modernizing establishment who prefer to emphasize their country's mystical, rather than
its historical, past. More recently world attention has been drawn to Indian
archaeologists who have been using their discipline to promote the cause of Hindu
nationalism
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
