1,721,012 research outputs found
Mixed-treatment comparison of anabolic (teriparatide and PTH 1-84) therapies in women with severe osteoporosis
No full textPurpose: The recent development of compounds with anabolic action on bone have increased the range of therapeutic options for the treatment of osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures. Two major PTH analogs, the synthetic full-length 1-84 PTH molecule and the recombinant 1-34 N-terminal fragment (teriparatide), are available for the treatment of osteoporosis in many countries. There have bee no comparative trials on the bone anabolic effects of these compounds. Materials and methods: In this study we applied a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) to compare the efficacy of teriparatide versus PTH 1-84 for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with severe osteoporosis. With this approach the relative treatment effect of one intervention over another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head comparison. Among the candidate papers selected for analysis, two randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of teriparatide and PTH 1-84 met the selection criteria and underwent MTC analysis. Results: Based on a fixed-effect MTC model analysis of data from two RCTs, teriparatide (20g/day) showed a 70% and 94% probability of being the best treatment for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively. Together with a lack of statistical significance, this study has additional limitations. Some differences in trial procedures and populations exist; another limitation concerns the impossibility of carrying out a randomized-effect model MTC, due to sample exiguity. Furthermore, in order to consider unknown or unmeasured differences of covariates across trials, a random-effects approach would be preferred in order to assess the presence of heterogeneity across comparisons. In contrast, in our analysis a fixed-effect MTC model only was used. Conclusions: Teriparatide is expected to provide a greater efficacy over PTH 1-84 with both vertebral and non-vertebral fracture prevention in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. © 2012 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved
Indirect comparison of etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis: mixed treatment comparison using placebo as common comparator
No full textPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disorder that is commonly associated with skin psoriatic lesions and can lead to severe disability. Current pharmacologic therapy for PsA includes TNFα-blocking agents for patients who are intolerant of or have an inadequate response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Currently, there are no published randomized controlled trials providing a head-to-head comparison of the effectiveness of the three TNFα-blocking agents used most often to treat patients with PsA (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab). In this study, we have performed the first indirect comparison among these biologic agents, in this setting, using a mixed treatment comparison analysis of the data from pivotal trials regarding efficacy profiles of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab evaluated as American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response. Our results suggest that etanercept is expected to provide the greatest ACR20 response among the anti-TNFα agents compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatments. This analysis may be relevant for clinical decision-making, hence improving the management of PsA patients
Ranking antireabsorptive agents to prevent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis by mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
No full textINTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, showing in double-blind, randomized, controlled trials a significant reduction of incidence of new vertebral fractures compared to placebo. Recently also, Denosumab has been shown to reduce the appearance of new vertebral fractures by blocking RANK. There are not head to head comparative studies between the above mentioned drugs. Mixed treatment comparison, an extension of traditional meta-analysis, is able to compare simultaneously several drugs across a range producing a synthetic evidence of efficacy and a range of probability as to the best treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to simultaneously compare alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab in the prevention of OP vertebral fractures in a Bayesian meta-analysis for assessing indirect comparisons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search for randomized controlled trials involving alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab was conducted using several databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a double blind treatment period of at least 3 years were included. Men and Glucorticoid Induced osteoporosis, RCTs having as primary or secondary endpoints continuous values as body mineral density (BMD) and studies comparing different dosing regimens of the same agent, which are not used in clinical practice, were excluded. Only fully published reports were considered. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs were identified providing data on 31,393 participants. Zolendronate had the highest probability (52%) of being the most effective treatment towards placebo, followed by denosumab (46% probability), ibandronate and then alendronate and risedronate against placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mixed treatment comparisons among alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab did not show a statistically significant difference, this analysis suggests that zolendronate, compared to placebo, is expected to provide the highest rate of reduction in vertebral fractures affecting osteoporosis affected patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
