307,398 research outputs found
A protocol for an experimental investigation of the effects of pain-related interpretation bias modification on interpretation of ambiguous somatosensory and linguistic stimuli in healthy individuals
No full textResearchers are increasingly exploring the existence and potential implications of pain-related cognitive biases in clinical and non-clinical populations, using a range of paradigms and stimuli to test theoretical predictions and refine models. One avenue of investigation explores the implications of biased pain-related interpretations in pain-free individuals, which may shed light on processes of transition from a pain-free state to acute pain, and acute pain to chronic pain. The primary aim of the main study detailed in this protocol is to investigate the effects of pain-related cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) on the interpretation of ambiguous somatosensory stimuli. When deciding the point at which to report their level of pain threshold and tolerance, participants must by necessity interpret somatosensory sensations. Sensations around the pain threshold are likely to be ambiguously painful, sometimes interpreted as painful and sometimes not, which has been proposed as a zone of uncertainty. A pilot study was first conducted to test whether the proposed experimental design is feasible and appropriate, and to ascertain study effect sizes. Eighteen healthy participants were randomised to complete either benign CBM-I (trained towards neutral interpretations of ambiguous scenarios; n = 9) or pain CBM-I (trained towards pain-related interpretations of ambiguous scenarios; n = 9). The Ambiguous Scenarios Task was used to train interpretation biases, and a novel Interpretation of Somatosensory Sensations Assessment was used to explore interpretation of ambiguous somatosensory sensations around the individual’s pain threshold. Participants receiving pain CBM-I, compared to those receiving benign CBM-I, had higher pain-related interpretation bias scores on the test phase of the Ambiguous Scenarios Task with a large effect size, and showed higher intensity and unpleasantness ratings on the Interpretation of Somatosensory Sensations Assessment typically with medium to large effect sizes. These paradigms are suitable for a full-scale investigation. Modifications made to the experimental design based on insights from the pilot study are discussed. This research extends beyond pain patient populations to researchers and clinicians working with other conditions, especially anxiety and mood disorders where patients may misinterpret or catastrophize ambiguous bodily sensations
Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence pertaining to attentional bias for painful and nonpainful somatosensory stimuli in individuals with chronic pain. Eligible studies were identified through searches of Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms were words and phrases organised into 3 concept blocks: pain condition, cognitive process, and stimuli/paradigm. The search identified 29 eligible studies (reporting 32 eligible experiments), of which quantitative meta-analysis was possible for 16 studies (19 experiments). The meta-analysis found that chronic pain patients, excluding somatoform pain patients, showed significantly greater attentional bias to stimuli in the somatosensory modality than healthy controls (k = 9, g = 0.34). In addition, meta-analysis of studies that used a temporal order judgement task found that patients with unilateral chronic pain showed a spatial attentional bias away from somatosensory stimuli (k = 7, effect estimate = 22.43 ms) and visual stimuli (k = 2, effect estimate = 13.75 ms) on or near the painful body side. Most studies of attentional bias to the somatosensory modality recruited samples of patients with fibromyalgia, whereas most studies of spatial attentional bias assessed patients with complex regional pain syndrome. The extent to which these results generalise to other pain conditions is therefore unclear. We recommend future research test spatial and modality attentional biases across chronic pain conditions and examine the psychometric properties of attentional bias measurement paradigms for use with chronic pain populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124510.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
L’oro del XXI secolo si chiama attenzione
No full textIl valore di piattaforme come Instagram o X si basa sullo sfruttamento di una risorsa umana preziosa e relativamente scarsa: l’attenzione. Il design ha un impatto nella cattura dell'attenzione insieme agli algoritmi che ne controllano l'ordine e la visibilità
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Author, publisher and bookseller : a tripartite synergy in Nigerian book industry
No full textThis work is about the roles of Author, Publisher and Bookseller in Book development in
Nigeria. The paper started by delving into the history of Book Publishing in Nigeria after
which it proceeded by defining who an author, a publisher, and a bookseller is and
expatiated on the indispensable roles of these key actors in Nigerian Book Industry and in
the emerging Information Society. Furthermore, the various constraints to book
development were identified while the paper advised on how the Book Industry can be
further promoted in Nigeria. However, the paper concluded and made recommendations
on how the Book sector can help in enhancing scholarship in the country
- …
