1,720,971 research outputs found

    2018 Genomic Database Governance Survey - main variables

    No full text
    This dataset includes data from the 2018 Genomic Database Governance Survey (main variables)

    2018 Genomic Database Governance Survey - main variables

    No full text
    This dataset includes data from the 2018 Genomic Database Governance Survey (main variables)

    Temporal Flexibility and Careers: The Role of Large-Scale Organizations for Physicians

    No full text
    This study investigates how employment in large-scale organizations affects the work lives of practicing physicians. Well-established theory associates larger organizations with bureaucratic constraint, loss of workplace control, and dissatisfaction, but this author finds that large scale is also associated with greater schedule and career flexibility. Ironically, the bureaucratic processes that accompany large-scale organization also allow for a reduction of patient demands on individual physicians, freeing those physicians to pursue other career activities or to fulfill family responsibilities. Large-scale organizations thus appear to represent a trade-off between workplace control and temporal flexibility, and many physicians appear to embrace this trade-off. The data come from surveys and interviews conducted in 2002. Implications extend to other professional and managerial labor markets in which client demands constrain schedules and careers

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    gift of time : large organizations, new demographics, and the restructuring of physician time

    No full text
    Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2003.Includes bibliographical references (p. 195-206).This thesis contributes to theory and research at the intersection of professions, labor markets, and careers. To do so, it draws on longitudinal and cross-sectional data on physicians in different organizational arrangements. Physicians have been migrating into larger medical practice organizations over the past three decades, creating a valuable research opportunity. Previous writing on the professions and on careers implies that large, bureaucratic organizations constrain autonomy and are therefore anathema to professionals. Instead, I observe that many physicians find these larger structures to be emancipating because such organizations provide unique access to highly-valued career options. These career options are possible because large organizations have scale and systems that address a fundamental temporal problem for doctors: availability whenever the patient requires attention. With a pool of substitutes for the individual physician, and systems that facilitate patient hand-offs, the large organization offers a predictable schedule and moderate hours when compared with traditional private practice. As a result, large organizations open up an expanded portfolio of career options, including part-time clinician, and facilitate transitions between different roles. These career options are greatly valued within the current physician workforce, particularly among the growing ranks of female physicians and those physicians in dual-career families. The dissertation is organized into three papers. The first paper asks which types of physicians are employed in large organizations, testing two competing accounts from professions theory and careers research using national survey data.(cont.) The second paper uses a longitudinal survey conducted by the author in order to investigate how different career options are utilized over time within one large medical practice organization. Finally, the third paper draws on detailed interview data from that same setting to document how the large organization enables schedule restructuring and, as a consequence, provides an expanded range of career options. Taken together, this work contributes to a new understanding of professionals, one that emphasizes heterogeneity in career interests and the possibility of meeting those interests through individually-tailored careers inside large organizations. By neglecting this individual heterogeneity, we risk assuming that the movement of professionals into large organizations will result only in dispirited practice. In contrast, through the lens of career diversity, bureaucracies actually take on a liberating character for many doctors. Similarly, while the careers literature has emphasized the flexibility of independent practice arrangements, I find physicians to value bureaucratic employment precisely because it accommodates their temporal career interests.by Forrest Scott Briscoe.Ph.D

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore