1,720,962 research outputs found

    D̄p̄ 6 / De conceptione Beatae Virginis Mariae

    No full text
    Bollanus, Dominicus. Mit Widmungsvorrede des Autors an Nicolaus Marcellu

    De conceptione Beatae Virginis Mariae

    No full text
    Dominicus Bollanu

    Memòria Digital de Catalunya

    Get PDF
    Tít. obtingut de l'epígraf del f. sign. a3 del vol. 1. A l'epígraf del f. sign. a2 del vol. 1: Hec est tabula omniu[m] sermonu[m] contentoru[m] in hoc voluminePeu d'impr. obtingut dels repertorisPaginació vol. 1: [480] p.Signatures vol. 1: a-y8, (1-8)8Tipus gòtics de dues mides i 2 columnesL'epígraf del f. sign. a2 del vol. 1 en vermell i espais en blanc per a les caplletresConté (segons GW): 1. Sermones quadragesimales de poenitentia etc. 2. Sermones de adventu etc . Bollanus, Dominicus: De conceptione BMV. 3.Sermones de timore divinorum iudiciorum etc .Vol. 1 conté (segons ISTC): Sermones quadragesimales de poenitentia; Sermo in festo annuntiationis virginis Mariae'Ne timeas Maria'; Sermo de praedestinatorum numero et damnatorum; Sermo de catenis peccatorum; Sermo de spe bona; Sermo de virginitate; Sermo de iudicio pestilentia

    [Sermones de adventu]

    No full text
    [Robertus de Liteo]; [Anhang:] [Dominici Bollani ... in questione de concepcione gloriosissime virginis Marie Prohemium

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore