1,720,959 research outputs found

    Rhacocleis annulata Fieber, 1853, espèce nouvelle pour la France (Orth., Tettigoniidae)

    No full text
    Bardet Olivier, Boitier Emmanuel. Rhacocleis annulata Fieber, 1853, espèce nouvelle pour la France (Orth., Tettigoniidae). In: Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, volume 111 (4), décembre 2006. p. 474

    Rhacocleis annulata Fieber, 1853, espèce nouvelle pour la France (Orth., Tettigoniidae)

    No full text
    Bardet Olivier, Boitier Emmanuel. Rhacocleis annulata Fieber, 1853, espèce nouvelle pour la France (Orth., Tettigoniidae). In: Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, volume 111 (4), décembre 2006. p. 474

    Description de la femelle de Rhacocleis bonfilsi Galvagni, 1976 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)

    No full text
    Description of the female of Rhacocleis bonfilsi Galvagni, 1976 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). The authors describe the female of Rhacocleis bonfilsi (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae), discovered for the first time in Corsica (France). The morphological characteristics of these females are compared to those of females of the other Corsican species [R. germanica (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1840) and R. corsicana Bonfils, 1960]. Although absent from Corsica, R. neglecta (Costa Lima, 1863) is also included in the analysis. It appears that the diagnostic features are the size and the shape of the ovipositor, and the sub-genital plate.Les auteurs décrivent la femelle de Rhacocleis bonfilsi (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae), découverte pour la première fois en Corse. L''article expose les caractéristiques morphologiques de ces femelles en les comparant à celles des autres espèces de Corse [R. germanica (Herrich-Schaeffer, 1840), R. corsicana Bonfils, 1960]. R. neglecta (Costa Lima, 1863), absente de Corse, est également incluse dans l''analyse. Les caractères diagnostiques sont la forme et la taille de l''ovipositeur et la plaque sous-génitale.Bardet Olivier, Boitier Emmanuel, Petit Daniel. Description de la femelle de Rhacocleis bonfilsi Galvagni, 1976 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). In: Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, volume 114 (4),2009. pp. 431-436

    À propos de l'Atlas des Orthoptères et des Mantides de France (J.-F. Voisin coord., 2003)

    No full text
    About the Atlas of the Grasshoppers, Crickets and Mantids of France (J.-F. Voisin edit., 2003). The book Atlas des Orthoptères et des Mantides de France is analysed. Mistakes and gaps are given with regard to nomenclature, taxonomy and data (recent or old) about geographical distribution of the species.L 'Atlas des Orthoptères et des Mantides de France (2003) est analysé. Des erreurs et lacunes sont signalées, notamment en ce qui concerne la nomenclature, la taxinomie et les données (récentes et anciennes) sur la répartition des espèces.Defaut Bernard, Boitier Emmanuel, Cloupeau Roger, Dusoulier François, Luquet Gérard Christian, Morin Didier, Sardet Éric. À propos de l'Atlas des Orthoptères et des Mantides de France (J.-F. Voisin coord., 2003). In: Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, volume 109 (5), décembre 2004. pp. 507-526

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore