1,720,966 research outputs found

    Early apple fruit development under photoselective nets

    Full text link
    The objective of this 2-year study (2017, 2019) was to evaluate the influence of photoselective nets on apple fruit growth, focusing on the initial fruit growth stages of “Pink Lady”. Trees were subjected to four photoselective nets (Blue, Red, White and Yellow) and a standard black one (serving as Control), resulting in 5 light environments (LE), all shading at 20%. From 20 to 90 DAFB, 32 fruit and extension shoots, for each LE, were measured for a total of 11 times during the season. For each LE, fruit gauges were also installed to monitor fruit daily growth parameters, from 50 to 90 DAFB. At harvest, all fruit from each light environment were weighed and quality parameters were measured on 40 fruit per treatment. For each year, correlations were made to test the influence of LEs on final fruit weight and quality, and the impact that extension shoot growth had on fruit growth. In both years, white and control nets led to the production of fruits with higher weight compared to the other treatments (blue, red and yellow nets). In 2019, LEs did not appear to influence the relationship between shoot and fruit growth, probably due to the higher crop load and the massive pruning carried out the previous year. The higher vegetative outburst in this year might have unbalanced resources towards the shoots, than towards the fruit. Results show how weather and orchard management heavily influenced the trees responses. Yet, the consistent findings of final fruit weight, for both years, indicate that different wavelengths influence fruit and shoot behavior, even at early phenological stages. Hence, growers searching for bigger fruit should refer to white and black nets. Further studies approaching this technology can help improve apple production management and knowledge of the use of photoselective nets

    Beneficial effect of secondary treated wastewater irrigation on nectarine tree physiology

    No full text
    Irrigation with secondary treated wastewater (STW) as a support to traditional irrigation management is becoming a necessary alternative to addressing issues of water shortage and fertilizer saving. The application of STW on young potted plants of Prunus persica (L.); cv: Big Top, grafted on GF 677, was studied outdoors on two consecutive seasons, during which three different irrigation treatments were compared: 1) irrigation with STW; 2) irrigation with tap water with the addition of mineral fertilizer (TW + MF) and 3) irrigation with tap water (TW). To assess the effects of the different irrigation treatments, tree nutritional status, shoot growth, Stem Cross Sectional Area (SCSA), Trunk Cross Sectional Area (TCSA), leaf gas exchanges, plant water status, fruit growth, fruit yield and quality were monitored during both seasons. Tree nutritional status, vegetative growth, TCSA, cumulative plant photosynthesis, fruit growth and yield were positively influenced by STW irrigation, compared to TW. TW + MF trees showed the highest vegetative growth and vegetative/reproductive ratio. This induced a rise in their water use and a consequent decrease in stem water potential, indicating the onset of water stress conditions. Results indicated that there was no negative effect of STW application on any of the monitored parameters. STW partially improved the plant physiological, nutritional and productive performances due to its intrinsic fertilizing effect. These results encourage further studies on the possibilities to directly use STW as an alternative source for irrigating and fertigating fruit crops even in open field conditions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore