1,720,960 research outputs found
Fidelity to the original in models obtained with double impression technic (14 element bridge)
No full textImpression taking with elastic masses in fixed protheses: I: Double impression technique
No full textFidelity of the model from the original (14 unit bridge): possibility and limits of duplication of the model
No full textImpression taking with elastic masses in fixed protheses: II: Impression in one sitting with individual tray
No full textFidelity to the original of models obtained with the single impression technic with individual tray (bridge of 14 elements)
No full text
Influence of saliva on the adhesiveness of the second paste to the first in the double impression technic
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
