1,720,954 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Using Commodity Futures Trading Commission Reports, Does Open Interest of Short Futures Contracts for Rice Differ from Other Row Crops During Harvest?
This thesis investigates whether the open interest of short futures contracts for rice behaves similarly to corn, soybeans, and oats around harvest season, using data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Futures contracts are a crucial tool for farmers and grain handlers to manage price risk, especially during periods of high market volatility like harvest. While the seasonality of futures hedging for corn and soybeans is well-established, there is minimal research on how rice fits into this pattern.
Using CFTC\u27s weekly Commitments of Traders reports for 2006 to 2023, this study analyzes the open interest in short hedging positions by commercial traders across all four crops. A centered 12-month moving average was applied to create an index that normalizes open interest and allows for comparison across commodities with vastly different market sizes. Results were visualized by crop year and tested statistically using paired t-tests and Tukey’s HSD to identify significant seasonal shifts.
The findings confirmed that corn and soybeans exhibit a strong seasonal trend, with short positions spiking during harvest and dropping post-harvest. Oats followed a similar but less pronounced pattern due to its smaller volume. Rice showed a weaker seasonal signal. While rice open interest does rise during harvest months, the trend is more gradual and statistically less significant. This weaker signal is likely due to thinner market liquidity and different marketing practices in the rice industry, such as cooperative-based selling.
Overall, the results suggest that while rice futures exhibit some seasonal hedging activity, it is not as consistent or pronounced as that of other row crops. Understanding these differences can help both speculators and producers better time their market activity, especially in thinly traded commodities like rice
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Using Commodity Futures Trading Commission Reports, Does Open Interest of Short Futures Contracts for Rice Differ from Other Row Crops During Harvest?
This thesis investigates whether the open interest of short futures contracts for rice behaves similarly to corn, soybeans, and oats around harvest season, using data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Futures contracts are a crucial tool for farmers and grain handlers to manage price risk, especially during periods of high market volatility like harvest. While the seasonality of futures hedging for corn and soybeans is well-established, there is minimal research on how rice fits into this pattern.
Using CFTC\u27s weekly Commitments of Traders reports for 2006 to 2023, this study analyzes the open interest in short hedging positions by commercial traders across all four crops. A centered 12-month moving average was applied to create an index that normalizes open interest and allows for comparison across commodities with vastly different market sizes. Results were visualized by crop year and tested statistically using paired t-tests and Tukey’s HSD to identify significant seasonal shifts.
The findings confirmed that corn and soybeans exhibit a strong seasonal trend, with short positions spiking during harvest and dropping post-harvest. Oats followed a similar but less pronounced pattern due to its smaller volume. Rice showed a weaker seasonal signal. While rice open interest does rise during harvest months, the trend is more gradual and statistically less significant. This weaker signal is likely due to thinner market liquidity and different marketing practices in the rice industry, such as cooperative-based selling.
Overall, the results suggest that while rice futures exhibit some seasonal hedging activity, it is not as consistent or pronounced as that of other row crops. Understanding these differences can help both speculators and producers better time their market activity, especially in thinly traded commodities like rice
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
