1,720,960 research outputs found
Hydrological and water quality watershed modelling using GIS techniques
No full textAzienda Mediterranea Gas e Acqua (Italy) SpA, Genov
Impact of the Lambro River on the state of Pusiano Lake, Italy: an in-stream nutrients modelling approach
No full textCurrent European water law inspires research, within which it is necessary to investigate numerous phenomena, with the aim to place responsible authorities in the conditions for the correct application of the norm. The attention is addressed mainly to the attainment of good water quality status, according to Water Framework Directive (WFD). This paper briefly presents a methodology used for implementation of watershed approach, with an aim of defining water quality in the lake’s immissary as a result of all different pollution-generating activities within the watershed. This paper describes therefore research lines of monitoring and modelling efforts to characterize nutrient loads in watershed scale. Following this integrated approach, it has been possible to identify satisfactory solutions to develop watershed project
Water quality study using integrated models for watershed scale: a case study on Pusiano Lake catchment
No full textImpact of the Lambro River on the state of the Pusiano Lake: an in-stream nutrients modelling approach
No full textThe Qual2k model as a module of an integrated watershed modelling approach to water quality management
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
