1,721,068 research outputs found
Thiopurines and IBD : pharmacology and toxicity
Mulder, C.J.J. [Promotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor
Tiny Microbes, Big Data: Gut Microbiota Profiling for Clinical Diagnostics
Savelkoul, P.H.M. [Promotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor]Budding, A.E. [Copromotor
Optimalisation of conventional therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: Old wine in new bottles
Mulder, C.J.J. [Promotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor]Boer, N. de [Copromotor
Thiopurines: Improving treatment of inflammatory bowel disease
Mulder, C.J.J. [Promotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor]Boer, K.H.N. de [Copromotor
Microbiota and Flatography in Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disease
Savelkoul, P.H.M. [Promotor]Benninga, M.A. [Promotor]Kneepkens, C.M.F. [Copromotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor
Culture free microbiology: A new approach to rapid eubacterial molecular diagnostics and clinical microbiota characterization
Savelkoul, P.H.M. [Promotor]Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.J.E. [Promotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor
Crohn and Bone: A quest for the mechanism of inflammation-induced osteoporosis
Lips, P.T.A.M. [Promotor]Klein Nulend, J. [Promotor]Bravenboer, N. [Copromotor]Lems, W.F. [Copromotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor
Biomarkers and Thiopurines in IBD: when two worlds collide
Mulder, C.J.J. [Promotor]Gearry, R.B. [Promotor]Boer, K.H.N. de [Copromotor]Bodegraven, A.A. van [Copromotor
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
