1,721,145 research outputs found
Comparative study between the costs of clinical, surgical and percutaneous treatments in patients with stable coronary multiple arterial disease: 10 years\' follow-up
Introdução: Análise da custo-efetividade no tratamento da doença multiarterial coronária têm ganhado importância nos ensaios clínicos, uma vez que as principais opções terapêuticas: cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica (CRM), intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) e tratamento medicamentoso (TM) apresentam eficácia similar em determinados subgrupos de pacientes. Atualmente os interesses direcionados à análise econômica têm crescido, uma vez que os gastos na saúde aumentaram com o desenvolvimento de novas tecnologias, porém os recursos disponíveis são finitos e merecem ser administrados. Objetivo: Analisar, prospectivamente, o custo comparativo das três formas terapêuticas da doença multiarterial coronária estável, durante dez anos de seguimento. Métodos: Foi computado o custo terapêutico global de 611 pacientes do ensaio clínico The Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II), baseado na remuneração fornecida pelo sistema de saúde suplementar do Instituto do Coração do HC/FMUSP, utilizando valores em dólares. Posteriormente, a análise de custoefetividade foi realizada corrigindo o custo cumulativo obtido em cada grupo para o \"tempo livre de eventos clínicos\" e também para a combinação de \"tempo livre de eventos\" acrescido de \"tempo livre de angina\". Resultados: O TM apresentou um custo cumulativo ao final de dez anos de US14.292; e o grupo CRM apresentou um custo de US11.136 para TM; US17.883 para CRM. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os 3 grupos (p < 0,0001) e a análise pareada, mostrou um menor custo para o grupo tratamento clínico tanto comparado com CRM (p < 0,0001) quanto comparado com ICP (p < 0,0001). O tratamento CRM contra ICP, também mostrou menor custo (p < 0,0001). Os custos corrigidos para sobrevida livre de eventos e angina foram, US45.989 para ICP e US27.920 para CRM; com expressiva diferença entre os 3 grupos (p < 0,0001). Na comparação dos grupos, observou-se um menor custo no grupo tratamento clínico comparado com ICP (p < 0,0001), o grupo angioplastia também teve um maior custo quando comparado com o grupo cirúrgico (p < 0,001). Contudo entre o grupo tratamento medicamentoso e tratamento cirúrgico não houve diferença significativa (p=0,5613). Conclusão: A análise econômica comparativa de longa data, revelou que ICP foi o tratamento menos custo-efetivo. O tratamento medicamentoso foi o mais custo-efetivo na prevenção de eventos, porém na prevenção de eventos e angina, teve custo-efetividade semelhante ao tratamento cirúrgicoIntroduction: The cost-effectiveness analysis in multivessel coronary artery disease treatment have gained importance in clinical trials, since the main treatment options: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical treatment (MT) have similar efficacy in certain subgroups of patient. Currently, the concernment in economic analysis have grown, since Medical Treatment costs have increased with the constant development of new technologies, but the available budget are finite and should be administered. Objective: prospectively analyze the comparative cost of the three medical treatments for stable multivessel coronary artery disease, during ten years follow-up. Methods: It was calculated the overall therapeutic cost of 611 patients in the clinical trial \"The Second Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II) \", considering the remuneration provided by the health insurance system of the Heart Institute of HC/FMUSP converted to dollar currency. Afterward, the costeffectiveness analysis was conducted by adjusting the cumulative cost obtained at each group for the \"time free of clinical events\" and also for the combination of \"time free of events\" and \"time free of angina\". Results: The MT had a cumulative cost, at the end of ten years, of US 6,183.00; PCI had a cost of US 12,316.00. The costs adjusted for \"events-free survival\" were US 26,912.00 for PCI and US 17,883.00 for CABG. There was a statistically significant difference between the 3 groups (p < 0.0001) and paired analysis showed lower cost for the medical treatment group compared with CABG (p < 0.0001) and PCI (p < 0.0001). The CABG compared with PCI also showed lower cost (p < 0.0001). The adjusted costs for \"survival free of clinical events and angina\" were US25,690.00 for MT; US27,920.00 for CABG; with a significant difference between the 3 groups (p < 0.0001). Comparing the groups, it can be seen a lower cost in the medical treatment group, compared with CABG (p < 0.0001), and also in comparison with PCI (p < 0.0001). However, the comparison between the medical treatment group and surgical treatment group showed no significant difference (p=0.5613). Conclusion: The long-term comparative economic analysis revealed that PCI showed up to be the least cost-effective treatment. The medical treatment was the most cost-effective in \"events prevention\", but considering \"events and angina prevention\", it had a cost-effectiveness similar to surgical treatmen
Control of heart rate as an additional therapeutic strategy in patients with decompensated heart failure: a prospective, randomized, blind and placebo-controlled study
Introdução. Frequência cardíaca (FC) elevada é reconhecida como um fator prognóstico de maior mortalidade na insuficiência cardíaca aguda descompensada (ICAD). Entretanto, pouco se conhece sobre os efeitos da redução da FC na evolução de pacientes com ICAD em ritmo sinusal, não havendo estudo clínico desenhado especificamente para o esclarecimento desta questão até o momento. Objetivos. Avaliar a eficácia e segurança da redução da FC através da inibição da corrente I(f) atrial em pacientes hospitalizados com ICAD em ritmo sinusal. Avaliar os efeitos de curto prazo da redução da FC nos parâmetros hemodinâmicos e de função ventricular por ecocardiografia e sobre os biomarcadores séricos de IC. Métodos. Estudo clínico randomizado, duplo-cego, controlado com placebo, unicêntrico. Os critérios de inclusão foram admissão por ICAD, fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) 80 bpm, INTERMACS >= 3 e ritmo sinusal. Os participantes do estudo (n=46, 48% feminino, idade média de 48±15 anos) receberam tratamento da ICAD orientado por diretriz e 5 mg de ivabradina (N = 23) ou placebo (N = 23) de 12/12 horas por 1 mês. Os desfechos estudados foram a variação em relação ao basal, aferida no quinto dia de intervenção, das seguintes variáveis: FC, pressão arterial sistêmica; volume sistólico (VS), índice cardíaco (Icar), FEVE, strain longitudinal global do VE (SLG-VE), índice de performance do miocárdio (IPM), relação E/A, tempo de desaceleração da onda E (TD onda E), relação E/e´, excursão sistólica máxima do anel tricúspide lateral (TAPSE), velocidade sistólica máxima do anel tricúspide lateral (s´), variação fracional da área do ventrículo direito (VFA), strain longitudinal global do ventrículo direito (SLG-VD), peptídeo natriurético tipo B (BNP), troponina, proteína C reativa (PCR), creatinina e NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin). Os pacientes foram acompanhados durante a internação e após a alta até o sexto mês, ou até a ocorrência de um evento cardiovascular pré-especificado. Resultados. A ivabradina reduziu significativamente a FC em comparação com o placebo (-14 ± 5 vs 0,2 ± 6 bpm, p 80 bpm, INTERMACS >= 3 and sinus rhythm. Participants in the study (n = 46, 48% female, mean age 48 ± 15 years) received guideline-guided treatment for ADHF and 5 mg ivabradine (N = 23) or placebo (N = 23) 12/12 hours for 1 month. Outcomes were change from baseline measured on the fifth day of intervention for the following variables: HR, systemic arterial pressure, LV stroke volume (LVSV), cardiac index (CI), LVEF, LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), myocardial performance index (MPI), E/A, E wave deceleration time (E wave DT), E/e\' ratio, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular plane peak-systolic velocity (s´), right ventricle (RV) fractional area change (FAC), RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), troponin, reactive C protein (RCP), creatinine, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Patients were followed up during hospitalization and after discharge until the sixth month, or until the occurrence of a pre-specified cardiovascular event. Results. Ivabradine significantly reduced HR compared with placebo (-14 ± 5 vs 0.2 ± 6 bpm, p < 0.001). The HR reduction was accompanied by improvement in LVEF (5.5 ± 15 vs -3.0 ± 11%, p = 0.03), LVSV (5.8 ± 11 vs -1.8 ± 10 mL, p = 0.02), RV-GLS (2.0 ± 2.2 versus 0.3 ± 3.1%, p = 0.007), TAPSE (1.6 ± 2.4 vs. -0.2 ± 1,7 mm, p = 0.004), FAC (5.1 ± 7.8 vs -1.4 ± 4.5%, p = 0.001) and s´ (0.5 ± 1.3 vs. -0.4 ± 1.0 cm / s, p = 0.009). There was no difference in systemic arterial pressure, CI, MPI, E wave TD, BNP, troponin, RCP, NGAL and creatinine. Of the 46 patients, 24 (52%) presented events during follow-up, with 6 deaths and 3 transplants in placebo group and 5 deaths and 2 transplants in ivabradine group. HR on the fifth day of the intervention was a strong event predictor according to Cox proportional hazards model (HR 1.08 [95% CI 1.03-1.12], even when corrected for age, time from diagnosis of HF and gender. Conclusion. The data suggest that I(f) inhibition safely reduces HR in patients admitted with ADHF in sinus rhythm, with benefit to global cardiac function. Our study suggests that elevated HR may be considered a potential therapeutic target in patients with ADHF in sinus rhythm, requiring a multicenter study on the subjec
Effects of vasoconstrictor on dental procedures in heart failure: Results of a prospective , randomized double-blind study (Teeth-HF study)
Fundamento: O número de pacientes acometidos por insuficiência cardíaca (IC) cresce anualmente, em razão direta do aumento da longevidade, fato que ocorre mundialmente. Patologias bucais como perda do elemento dental e periodontopatias têm sido relacionadas e apresentam alta prevalência em pacientes com IC. Estes indivíduos necessitam de atendimento odontológico. O uso de solução anestésica local com vasoconstritor para procedimentos odontológicos para esta população continua controverso, pois pode gerar riscos cardiovasculares adversos. Objetivo: Analisar dor e alterações hemodinâmicas em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca, submetidos a procedimento odontológico sob anestesia local com ou sem epinefrina . Método: Estudo prospectivo, grupo paralelo, controlado, duplo-cego em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca, fração de ejeção < 45%, classe funcional II e III/IV e com terapêutica otimizada foram randomizados para procedimentos odontológicos (restaurações ou extrações) usando de 1,8ml a 3,6ml solução anestésica de lidocaína a 2% sem epinefrina (LSE) ou a mesma dose de lidocaína com epinefrina 1:100.000 (LCE). Resultados: Setenta e dois pacientes (50 anos ± 10 anos, 62% do sexo masculino, portadores de IC foram alocados para LSE (n=36) ou LCE (n=36). Foram observadas diferenças significativas no desfecho primário (dor) para os grupos que receberam LSE e efetuaram extrações dentárias. Não foram observadas diferenças nos valores de pressão arterial e frequência cardíaca antes, durante e após o procedimento dental em ambos os grupos. Entretanto, quando os grupos foram analisados separadamente, a pressão arterial aumentou e a frequência cardíaca reduziuse significativamente em relação à fase basal, durante o procedimento. Conclusão: A solução anestésica local de lidocaína com epinefrina mostrou ser superior no controle da dor e segura para pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca. Tanto no grupo LSE como no LCE não ocorreram alterações significativas nos parâmetros hemodinâmicosBackground: The number of patients with heart failure (HF) increases annually over the world. Oral diseases have been related to, and have shown high prevalence among this population. These patients need dental care. Using local anesthesia with vasoconstrictor for dental treatments is still controversial in patients with HF because it may generate adverse cardiovascular effects. Goal: To analyze pain and hemodynamic changes in patients with heart failure submitted to a dental procedure under local anesthesia with or without epinephrine. Methods: Prospective, parallel group, controlled, double-blind study , with heart failure patients, ejection fraction < 45%, NYHA class II and III / IV and with optimized therapy, were randomized to dental procedures (dental extraction or restoration) using 1,8 to 3.6ml of lidocaine without epinephrine (LSE) or lidocaine with epinephrine (LCE). ( Lidocaine 2% epinephrine 1:100.000). Results: Seventy two patients (50 ± 10 years, 62% male, 27% ischemic) were allocated to LSE (n = 36) or LCE (n = 36). It was observed a significant increase in pain , among patients that had dental extractions in the LSE group in comparison to LCE. No differences were observed in blood pressure, heart rate and pain scores before, during and after dental procedures in both groups. However, blood pressure increased and heart rate significantly reduced in relation to the baseline phase during and after the procedure in both groups when they were analyzed separately. Conclusion: Lidocaine with epinephrine (LCE) has shown to be more effective for pain control in heart failure patients. Concerning hymodinamic changes there was no difference between groups with or without epinephrine, and the treatment did not cause undesirable adverse cardiovascular effects
Respiratory filter reduces the cardiovascular effects associated with diesel exhaust exposure: a randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled study of heart failure
Introdução A poluição do ar é um fator de risco associado com descompensação e mortalidade em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca (IC). Objetivo Avaliar o impacto de um filtro de polipropileno sobre desfechos cardiovasculares em pacientes com IC e voluntários saudáveis durante exposição controlada à poluição. Métodos Ensaio clínico duplocego, controlado e cruzado, incluindo 26 pacientes com IC e 15 voluntários saudáveis, expostos a três protocolos diferentes de inalação randomizados por ordem: Ar Limpo; Exposição à Partículas de Exaustão do Diesel (ED); e ED filtrada. Os desfechos estudados foram função endotelial por índice de hiperemia reativa (RHi) e índice de aumento (Aix), biomarcadores séricos, variáveis de teste cardiopulmonar submáximo (caminhada de seis-minutos [tc6m]; consumo de oxigênio [VO2]; equivalente ventilatório de gás carbônico [VE/VCO2 slope]; consumo de O2 por batida [PulsoO2]) e variabilidade da frequência cardíaca (VFC). Resultados No grupo IC, a ED piorou o RHi [de 2,17 (IQR: 1,8-2,5) para 1,72 (IQR: 1,5-2,2); p=0,002], reduziu o VO2 [de 11.0 ± 3.9 para 8.4±2.8ml/Kg/min; p < 0.001], o tc6m [de 243,3±13 para 220,8 ± 14m; p=0,030] e o PulsoO2 [de 8.9 ± 1.0 para 7.8±0.7ml/bpm; p < 0.001]; e aumentou o BNP [de 47,0pg/ml (IQR: 17,3-118,0) para 66,5pg/ml (IQR: 26,5-155,5); p=0,004]. O filtro foi capaz de reduzir a concentração de poluição de 325±31 para 25±6?g/m3 (p < 0,001 vs. ED). No grupo IC, o filtro foi associado com melhora no RHi [2,06 (IQR: 1,5-2,6); p=0,019 vs. ED); aumento no VO2 (10.4 ± 3.8ml/Kg/min; p < 0.001 vs. ED) e PulsoO2 (9.7±1.1ml/bpm; p < 0.001 vs. ED); e redução no BNP [44,0pg/ml (IQR: 20,0-110,0); p=0,015 vs. ED]. Em ambos os grupos, a ED reduziu o Aix, sem efeito do filtro. O uso do filtro foi associado com maior ventilação e reinalação de CO2. Outras variáveis pesquisadas como VE/VCO2 slope e VFC não sofreram influências entre os protocolos. Conclusão A poluição do ar afetou adversamente o desempenho cardiovascular de pacientes com IC. Este é o primeiro ensaio clínico demonstrando que um simples filtrorespiratório pode prevenir a disfunção endotelial, a intolerância ao exercício e o aumento do BNP associados à poluição em pacientes com IC. O uso de máscaras com filtro tem o potencial de reduzir a morbidade associada à IC. Identificador ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01960920Background Air pollution is considered a risk factor for heart failure (HF) decompensation and mortality. The effects of respiratory filters on patients with HF exposed to air pollution have not been established. Objective To test the effects of a respiratory filter intervention (filter) during controlled pollution exposure Methods Double-blind, randomized to order and 3-way crossover study with 26 HF patients and 15 control volunteers. Participants were exposed in three separate sessions to: clean air, diesel exhaust exposure (DE) or filtered-DE. Endpoints were endothelial function via reactive hyperemia index (RHi), and arterial stiffness (Aix), serum biomarkers, variables from submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (sixminute walk test [6mwt]; oxygen uptake [VO2]; ventilation and carbon dioxide production ratio [VE/VCO2 slope]; oxygen uptake per heart beat [O2Pulse]), and heart rate variability (HRV). Results In patients with HF, DE was associated with a worsening in RHi [from 2.17 (IQR: 1.8-2.5) to 1.72 (IQR: 1.5-2.2); p=0.002]; a decline in VO2 [from 11.0±3.9 to 8.4±2.8ml/Kg/min; 0.001], 6mwt [from 243.3 +- 13.0 to 220.8±13.7m; p=0.030] and O2Pulse [from 8.9±1.0 to 7.8±0.7ml/beat; 0.001] and a rise in BNP [from 47.0pg/ml (IQR: 17.3-118.0) to 66.5pg/ml (IQR: 26.5-155.5); p=0.004]. Filtration reduced the particulate concentration (from 325±31 to 25±6?g/m3; 0.001 vs. DE). In the HF group, filter was associated with an improvement in RHi [2.06 (IQR: 1.5-2.6); p=0.019 vs. DE]; an increase in VO2 (10.4 ± 3.8ml/Kg/min; p < 0.001 vs. DE) and O2Pulse (9.7 ± 1.1ml/beat; p < 0.001 vs. DE); and also a decrease in BNP [44.0pg/ml (IQR: 20.0-110.0); p=0.015 vs. DE]. In both groups DE decreased Aix, however filtration did not change these responses. In both groups, filtration was associated with higher pulmonary ventilation and CO2 rebreathing. Other variables as VE/VCO2 slope and HRV did not differ between exposure protocols. Conclusion Air pollution adversely affects cardiovascular performance in HF patients. To our knowledge, this is the first trial demonstrating that a simple respiratory-filter can prevent endothelial dysfunction; exercise intolerance and BNP rise in patients with HF during DE. Given these potential benefits, the widespread use of filters in HF subjects exposed to traffic-derived air pollution may have beneficial public health impacts and reduce the burden of HF ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0196092
Study of the circulating levels of miR-208a in cardiotoxicity from patients under chemotherapy with anthracycline
INTRODUÇÃO: Cardiotoxicidade é frequentemente associada ao uso crônico de doxorubicina (DOX) podendo levar a cardiomiopatia e insuficiência cardíaca. A identificação de miRNAs cardiotoxicidade-específicos e seu potencial como biomarcadores poderia fornecer uma ferramenta prognostica valiosa e uma potencial área de intervenção. METODOLOGIA: Este é um sub-estudo do ensaio clínico prospectivo \"Efeito do Carvedilol na Prevenção da Cardiotoxicidade Induzida por Quimioterapia\" (ensaio CECCY) no qual incluiu 56 pacientes do sexo feminino (idade 49.9±3.3) provenientes do braço placebo. Os pacientes incluídos foram submetidos à quimioterapia com DOX seguido por taxanos. Troponina cardiaca I (cTnI), fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) e microRNAs foram mensurados periodicamente. RESULTADOS: Os níveis circulantes de miR-1, -133b, -146a e -423-5p aumentaram significativamente durante o tratamento (18.6, 11.5, 10.6 e 12.1-vezes respectivamente; p < 0.001) enquanto miR-208a e -208b foram indetectáveis. cTnI aumentou de 6.6 ± 0.3 para 46.7 ± 5.5 pg/ml (p < 0.001) enquanto FEVE tendeu a diminuir de 65.3±0.5 para 63.8±0.9 (p=0.053) após 12 meses; deis pacientes (17.9%) desenvolveram cardiotoxicidade. miR-1 foi associado a mudanças na FEVE (r2=0.363, p < 0.001) enquanto miR-1 e -133b foram associados a cTnI (r2 = 0.675 e 0.758; p < 0.001). Além disso, miR-1 antecipou a cardiotoxicidade e mostrou uma area sobre a curva maior que cTnI para discriminar pacientes que desenvolveram cardiotoxicidade daqueles que não desenvolveram (AUC = 0.849 e 456, p<0.001 e 0.663, respectivamente). CONCLUSÃO: Nossos dados sugerem miR-1 como um potencial novo biomarcador de cardiotoxicidade induzida por DOX em pacientes com câncer de mama. Estes resultados podem levar a novas estratégias de detecção precoce do risco de lesão cardíaca induzida por DOX bem como a introdução de uma nova área para intervençãoINTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity is frequently associated with the chronic use of doxorubicin (DOX) and may lead to cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Identification of cardiotoxicity-specific miRNA biomarkers could provide clinicians with a valuable prognosis tool and a potential area for intervention. METHODS: This is an ancillary study from the prospective trial \"Carvedilol Effect in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity.\" (CECCY trial) which included 56 female patients (49.9±3.3 age) from placebo arm. Enrolled patients were treated with DOX followed by taxanes. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI), left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and miRNAs were measured periodically. RESULTS: Circulating levels of miR-1, -133b, -146a and -423-5p increased along the treatment (18.6, 11.5, 10.6 and 12.1-fold respectively; p < 0.001); miR-208a and -208b were undetectable. cTnI increased from 6.6±0.3 to 46.7 ± 5.5 pg/ml (p < 0.001) while LVEF tended to decrease from 65.3±0.5 to 63.8±0.9 (p=0.053) over 12 months; ten patients (17.9%) developed cardiotoxicity. miR-1 was associated to changes in LVEF (r2=0.363, p < 0.001) while miR-1 and -133b were associated to cTnI (r2 = 0.675 and 0.758; p < 0.001). Furthermore, miR-1 anticipated cardiotoxicity and showed greater area under the curve than cTnI to discriminate between patients who did and did not developed cardiotoxicity (AUC = 0.849 and 456, p < 0.001 and 0.663, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest circulating miR-1 as a potential new biomarker of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients. These results may lead to new earlier strategies to detect drug-induced cardiac injury risk before it develops to an irreversible stage or introduce new area for interventio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
