1,720,977 research outputs found
A reliable and handy "rescue" approach to estimate central venous pressure
No full textNo abstract available
[Prevention of mycotic infections in liver transplant recipients: comparison of two chemoprophylactic protocols]
No full textACKGROUND:
The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of two chemoprophylactic protocols against mycotic infections in a liver transplant recipients population.
DESIGN:
single-blind, randomized.
SETTING:
Liver transplant Center of a National Health System teaching hospital.
METHODS:
Eighty-eight consecutive patients submitted to liver transplantation were enrolled in the study. Immediately before surgery they were randomized to receive sequential treatment with intravenous liposomal amphotericine B + oral itraconazole or intravenous fluconazole + oral itraconazole. Intravenous drugs were administered in the first postoperative week, and oral treatments for the following three weeks. In addition to analyzing the frequency and incidence of colonization, local and disseminated infection of mycotic origin, the causes of death and the possible risk factors for mycotic disease have been examined.
RESULTS:
Eighty-five patients completed the study. No significative difference was evident in the two groups as regards to single organ and systemic fungal infection rate. Two out of a total of 5 deaths were related to mycotic disease. Pre-transplant fungal colonization, more severe liver disease indicating the transplant procedure and the rejection of the graft were all risk factors for the development of mycotic infection.
CONCLUSIONS:
The two protocols used in the study showed and equal efficacy in preventing fungal infections in liver transplant recipients
Stress-inducing factors in ICUs: what liver transplant recipients experience and what caregivers perceive
No full texthe aim of this study was to compare a number of potentially stress-generating factors related to an intensive care unit (ICU) stay from the points of view of patients undergoing liver transplantation or elective major abdominal surgery and their caregivers in order to identify differences and similarities that may help to optimize patient care. The ICU Environmental Stressor Scale questionnaire was administered to 104 liver transplant recipients, 103 major abdominal surgery patients, 35 nurses and 21 physicians. The ICU staff were asked to complete the questionnaire on the basis of their perception of patient stressors. Both patient groups identified Being unable to sleep, Being in pain, Having tubes in nose/mouth, Missing husband/wife, and Seeing family and friends only a few minutes a day as the major stressors; the healthcare providers correctly identified the most stressing factors for the patients, but gave them higher scores. The mean scores were 71.9 +/- 18.7 for the transplant recipients, 66.3 +/- 20.9 for the patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, 99.7 +/- 19.2 for the nurses, and 92.7 +/- 16.1 for the physicians (P < 0.001). The qualitative evaluations of potentially stress-inducing ICU situations were substantially the same in the 2 patient groups, but the transplant recipients seemed to feel them more acutely. Although the caregivers identified the most discomforting situations, they overestimated the degree of stress they cause. The staff of each ICU should therefore seek to understand and reduce (even by means of simple interventions) the particular causes of psychophysical stress felt by their patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Postoperative intra-abdominal pressure and renal function after liver transplantation
No full textbstract
HYPOTHESIS:
Intra-abdominal hypertension frequently threatens renal function early after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
DESIGN:
A prospective study of consecutive patients who underwent OLT.
SETTING:
The intensive care unit of a National Health Service teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) of 108 consecutive patients who underwent OLT was postoperatively measured 3 times a day for 72 hours using the urinary bladder technique. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as an IAP of 25 mm Hg or higher.
RESULTS:
Thirty-four patients (31%) had a high IAP. Acute renal failure developed in 17 recipients (16%), 11 (65%) of whom had intra-abdominal hypertension (P<.01), with a mean +/- SD IAP of 27.9 +/- 9.9 mm Hg vs 18.6 +/- 5.2 mm Hg in those without acute renal failure (P<.001). The subjects with a high IAP were more frequently administered loop diuretics to maintain adequate diuresis (P<.001) and had a low mean arterial pressure on the day of surgery (P<.01), despite the fact that they were given more intravenous fluids (P<.01) and did not differ in the need for inotropic drugs. Logistic regression analysis showed that intraoperative transfusions of more than 15 U, respiratory failure, and intra-abdominal hypertension (P<.01) were independent risk factors for renal failure. The length of intensive care unit stay was similar in the patients with a normal and a high IAP, but mortality was higher among the latter (P =.02).
CONCLUSIONS:
Intra-abdominal hypertension is common after OLT and is significantly associated with renal failure, reduced urinary output, and intensive care unit mortality. It is, therefore, worth monitoring IAP in those undergoing OLT
Very early tracheal extubation without predetermined criteria in a liver transplant recipient population
No full textAbstract
This study of all patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) at our center between January 1997 and December 1999 evaluated the feasibility and safety of very early tracheal extubation without previous selection. Anesthetic management was the same in all cases, and tracheal extubation was performed on the basis of standardized criteria routinely adopted in operating rooms throughout the world, i.e., no residual curarization or anesthetic action, ability to swallow efficiently, and stable hemodynamics. One hundred sixty-nine patients underwent 181 OLTs during the study period. Tracheal extubation was performed within 3 hours of surgery in 115 cases, 8 hours in 19 cases, and 8 to 24 hours in 10 cases. In 36 cases, artificial ventilation was required for more than 24 hours or weaning was not possible. One patient died of primary graft nonfunction within 24 hours and was excluded from the analysis. The feasibility of early extubation was influenced by the amount of intraoperative transfused blood; efficacy of kidney, cardiac, and pulmonary function; and presence of encephalopathy (P <.001). No correlation was found with age or pre-OLT severity of hepatic disease, and the postoperative period was not compromised by early weaning. Very early extubation was feasible and safe in a large number of unselected transplant recipients, thus suggesting that the definition of early tracheal extubation should be changed from 8 to 3 hours after surgery
Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in liver transplant recipients: a prospective study
No full textBJECTIVE:
No data are available on the incidence and clinical relevance of increased intra-abdominal pressure after orthotopic liver transplantation. This study assessed abdominal hypertension in a population of transplanted patients as this may be an important cofactor in early postoperative complications.
DESIGN AND SETTING:
Prospective clinical study in an intensive care unit of a national health system teaching hospital
PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS:
Abdominal pressure was measured every 6 h using the urinary bladder method and was considered elevated when it was 25 mmHg or higher. Hemodynamic status was evaluated at the same times. Renal function was assessed on the basis of hourly urinary output by calculating serum creatinine on postoperative days 2 and 4 and the filtration gradient; patient outcomes were also considered.
RESULTS:
Intra-abdominal hypertension was observed in 32% of cases; the subjects with high abdominal pressure had significantly lower mean artery pressure values but did not differ in terms of central venous pressure or cardiac output. High intra-abdominal pressure was more frequently associated with renal failure, a lower filtration gradient, delayed postsurgical weaning from ventilation, and a worse outcome.
CONCLUSIONS:
Abdominal hypertension is frequent after liver transplantation and may be associated with a complicated post-operative course
- …
