187,101 research outputs found
Position Summary
No full textBidwell Cultural and Training Center complains that the Pittsburgh Plan "contains no mechanics for enforcing any of the agreements.
Recommended from our members
NACA Research Memorandums
No full text"About 500 additional references pertaining to hydrodynamic design of seaplanes have been compiled, and the information is presented in the form of abstracts classified under six main headings:GENERAL INFORMATION, HYDROSTATICS, HYDRODYNAMICS, AERODYNAMICS, OPERATION, and RESEARCH. The compilation is an extension of NACA RM No. L6I13, entitled "Abstracts Pertaining to Seaplanes," by Jerold M. Bidwell and Douglas A. King. An author index and a subject index are included" (p. 1)
Letter from J. Bidwell to J. P. Usher, 1863
No full textEnclosed his account for supplies furnished the Indians under order of Supt. G. M. Hanson
House Unpassed Legislation 1873, H 141 adopted resolutions, SC1/series 230, Petition of M.S. Bidwell [Marshall S. Bidwell?]
No full textPetition subject: Charles Sumner resolution Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25950399 Date of creation: (unknown) Petition location: Monterey Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James M. Barker, Pittsfield Selected signatures:M.S. Bidwell [Marshall S. Bidwell?]A.B. GarfieldWilber F. Minor Actions taken on dates: 1873-03-11 Legislative action: Received in the House on March 11, 1873 and placed on file Total signatures: 14 Legislative action summary: Received, placed on file Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 14 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: voters, ["others"] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Printed Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents Additional archivist notes: Includes note on circulation, To rescind and annul the censure of Charles Sumner for resolution on Civil War battle honors on regimental flags Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1873, H 141 adopted resolutions Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.</p
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
sj-pdf-1-ilr-10.1177_00197939221096112 – Supplemental material for Brokered Careers: The Role of Search Firms in Managerial Career Mobility
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-ilr-10.1177_00197939221096112 for Brokered Careers: The Role of Search Firms in Managerial Career Mobility by Matthew Bidwell, Kira Choi and Isabel Fernandez-Mateo in ILR Review</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
House Unpassed Legislation 1873, H 141 adopted resolutions, SC1/series 230, Petition of M.S. Bidwell [Marshall S. Bidwell?]
No full textPetition subject: Charles Sumner resolution Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:25950399 Date of creation: (unknown) Petition location: Monterey Legislator, committee, or address that the petition was sent to: James M. Barker, Pittsfield Selected signatures:M.S. Bidwell [Marshall S. Bidwell?]A.B. GarfieldWilber F. Minor Actions taken on dates: 1873-03-11 Legislative action: Received in the House on March 11, 1873 and placed on file Total signatures: 14 Legislative action summary: Received, placed on file Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 14 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: voters, ["others"] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Printed Additional non-petition or unrelated documents available at archive: no additional documents Additional archivist notes: Includes note on circulation, To rescind and annul the censure of Charles Sumner for resolution on Civil War battle honors on regimental flags Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: House Unpassed 1873, H 141 adopted resolutions Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.</p
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
