1,720,956 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Recommended from our members
Patent Litigation in China: Challenging Conventional Wisdom
Full text linkThe People's Republic of China has become a world leader in both patent applications and patent litigation after the Chinese government enacted new policies to stimulate domestic innovation and patent activities. These major developments have made China an integral venue of international patent protection for inventors and entrepreneurs. However, due to the lack of judicial transparency before 2014, most people had virtually no access to Chinese patent litigation data and knew little about how Chinese courts adjudicated patent cases. Instead, outside observers were left with a variety of impressions and had to guess how the courts adjudicates these cases based on the plain texts of the Chinese Patent Law and the limited number of cases released by the press. However, starting January 1, 2014, China mandated public access to all judgments via a database called China Judgements Online (CJO), making empirical studies possible. This Article analyzes all publicly available final patent infringement cases decided by local People's Courts in 2014. Surprisingly, findings in this Article contradict the long-standing beliefs held by many people about patent enforcement in China. One prominent example is that foreign patent holders were as likely as domestic patent holders to litigate and foreign patent holders received noticeably better results—specifically, higher win rates, injunction rates, and average damages. Another example is that plaintiffs won in 80.16% of all patent infringement cases and automatically got permanent injunctions in 90.25% of cases where courts found patent infringement. These new findings indicate that patent protection in China is stronger than once believed.</p
Recommended from our members
Empirical Study of Patent Infringement and Validity Cases in China
No full textAfter the Chinese government enacted new policies to stimulate domestic innovation and patent activities, China has become a world leader in both patent applications and patent litigation. These major developments, together with the escalated U.S.-China trade tensions, have made China an integral but controversial venue of international patent protection. However, due to the lack of judicial transparency in China prior to 2014, there had been virtually no access to case data. Before 2014, all public knowledge about Chinese patent cases was obtained from either interpreting the plain text of Chinese law and regulations or analyzing a limited number of published cases that the Supreme People’s Court considered having significant social impact.Patent cases in China are in need of a comprehensive empirical study. Taking advantage of the 2014 judicial reform and the public release of court documents in China, this article fills this gap by analyzing all publicly available patent infringement lawsuits and post-grant invalidity cases decided between 2014 and 2016 in China. Surprisingly, part of its findings disprove some long-standing beliefs about the Chinese patent system. One prominent example is that foreign parties fared much better than their Chinese counterparts. In infringement cases, foreign patentees were more likely to win than Chinese patent owners and received much higher damages. Moreover, foreign requesters succeeded more often in post-grant invalidation process than Chinese requesters. This Article also collects statistics on a number of other characteristics of patent cases in China. It provides comprehensive data on several different aspects of the Chinese patent system. Some of the key findings include that the overwhelming majority of patent infringement lawsuits in China involved mechanical patents instead of electrical and chemical patents; that on average, patent owners had waited quite a long time before enforcement; that at most, only about 0.6% of all issued patents are ever subject to invalidity challenges; etc. In addition to providing descriptive statistics, this article also conducts hypothesis testing, in an effort to identify potential predictors of the outcomes of patent cases in China. It finds that most variables tested in this article revealed significant predictive value. However, there are several exceptions. For infringement lawsuits, only one factor, economic regions, demonstrated no relationship with the amount of damages granted. Two factors, including plaintiffs’ residency and appeals, were not predictors of injunctions. For invalidity cases, prosecution length was not related to a patent’s validity
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
