310,760 research outputs found
Bhatia Distant
Checklist of Bhatia Distant Bhatia biconjugara Zhang & Zhang, 1998 Bhatia biconjugara Zhang & Zhang, 1998: 178, fig 1; Shang et al., 2006: 566, figs. 1–6 Distribution: China (Sichuan, Guangxi) Bhatia digitata Shang & Shen, 2006 Bhatia digitata Shang et al., 2006: 568, figs. 24–31 Distribution: China (Henan, Guangxi) Bhatia distanti Zhang & Webb, 1996 Bhatia distanti Zhang & Webb, 1996: 13, figs. 112–116; Viraktamath & Srinivasa, 2006: 39 Distribution: Sri Lanka; India Bhatia guamensis (Metcalf, 1946) Jamitettix guamensis Metcalf, 1946: 119 –120, fig. 10 a-e Bhatia guamensis (Metcalf), Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, 121–127 Distribution: USA (Guam) Bhatia hastata Shang & Shen, 2006 Bhatia hastata Shang & Shen, 2006: 567, figs. 18–23 Distribution: China (Guangxi) Bhatia javana (Melichar, 1914) Kutara javana Melichar, 1914: 132 Bhatia javana (Melichar), Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, figs. 134–138 Distribution: Indonisia (Java) Bhatia koreana (Kwon & Lee, 1979) Koreanopsis koreana Kwon & Lee, 1979: 50, figs. 1–5 Bhatia koreana, Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, figs. 139–144; Shang et al., 2006: 566, figs. 13–17 Distribution: China (Shaanxi), South Korea Bhatia lituriceps (Walker, 1869) Iassus lituriceps Walker, 1869: 323 Bhatia lituriceps (Walker), Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, fig. 487 Distribution: Sula Is. Bhatia metcalfi (Linnavuori, 1960) Jamitettix metcalfi Linnavuori, 1960: 326, figs. 46 a-e Bhatia metcalfi (Linnavuori), Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, figs. 117–120 Distribution: Caroline Is. Bhatia multispinosa Lu & Zhang sp. nov. Distribution: China (Sichuan) Bhatia olivacea (Melichar), 1908 Eutettix? olivacea Melichar, 1903: 191 –192, fig. 1 Bhatia olivacea (Melichar) Distant, 1908: 357; Kuoh, 1966; Webb, 1994: 116; Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, figs. 105–111; Zhang & Zhang, 1998: 180, fig. 3 Distribution: China (Hainan), Sri Lanka Bhatia quadrispinosa Shang & Zhang, 2006 Bhatia quadrispinosa Shang & Zhang, 2006: 571, figs. 39–45 Distribution: China (Sichuan) Bhatia radhamaniae Viraktamath & Shankara Murthy, 2009 Bhatia radhamaniae Viraktamath & Shankara Murthy, 2009: 48, figs. 1–13 Distribution: India (Karnataka) Bhatia sagittata Cai & Shen, 1999 Bhatia sagittata Cai & Shen, 1999: 38, fig. 3 Distribution: China (Henan) Bhatia satsumensis (Matsumura, 1914) Melichariella satsumensis Matsumura, 1914: 237 –238 Bhatia satsumensis, Zhang & Webb, 1996: 12, figs. 128–133; Zhang & Zhang, 1998: 179, figs. 2; Shang et al., 2006: 566, figs. 7–12 Distribution: China (Guangdong), Japan Bhatia serrata Viraktamath & Shankara Murthy, 2009 Bhatia serrata Viraktamath & Shankara Murthy, 2009: 50, figs. 14–27 Distribution: India (Kerala) Bhatia unicornis Shang & Li, 2006 Bhatia unicornis Shang et al., 2006: 573, figs. 46–50 Distribution: China (Guangdong)Published as part of Lu, Lin & Zhang, Yalin, 2015, A new species of the leafhopper genus Bhatia Distant (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from China, pp. 145-150 in Zootaxa 3911 (1) on pages 146-147, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3911.1.10, http://zenodo.org/record/23564
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Scientometric portrait of C. R. Bhatia, an indian geneticist and plant breeder
Publication productivity of C. R. Bhatia is documented
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
RHETORICAL VARIATION IN ENGLISH AND ITALIAN LAW RESEARCH ARTICLE ABSTRACTS: A CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS
The study of academic discourse has become an area of great interest over the last two decades, especially from a genre perspective (e.g. Swales 1990, 2004; Bhatia 1993, 2004). Research in the field has mainly focused on highly conventionalised written academic genres, such as research articles, abstracts, and textbooks, often combining linguistic and rhetorical analysis. Although not as widely studied as the research article itself or the textbook, the abstract has drawn the attention of a number of genre researchers (Salager-Meyer 1990; Bhatia 1993; Kaplan et al. 1994; Santos 1996; Bondi 1997, 2001; Hyland 2000; Martín-Martín 2003; Dahl 2004; Lorés-Sanz 2004, 2009; Samraj 2005; Pho 2008; Bondi and Cavalieri 2012; Bondi and Lorés-Sanz 2014).
Genre-based studies on research article (RA) abstracts have received quite a lot of scholarly attention in English (e.g. Graetz 1985; Berkenkotter and Huckin 1995; Santos 1996; Hyland 2000; Lorés-Sanz 2004; Cross and Oppenheim 2006; Swales and Feak 2009), across different disciplinary fields (Harvey and Horsella 1988; Salager-Meyer 1990; Tibbo 1992; Lindeberg 1996; Anderson and Maclean 1997; Hartley and Benjamin 1998; Samraj 2005; Busch-Lauer 2014; Cavalieri 2014), and across cultures. There are studies comparing English with Spanish (Martín-Martín 2003, 2005; Lorés-Sanz 2009), French (Crosnier 1993; Van Bonn and Swales 2007; Alonso-Almeida 2014; Hatzitheodorou 2014), Portuguese (Johns 1992), German (Busch-Lauer 1995), Swedish (Melander et al. 1997), and Arabic (Alharbi and Swales 2011). One notable exception to date is lack of attention to abstracts written in Italian.
The context of this work is provided by a previous study (Diani 2014) which looked at the rhetorical structure of English and Italian RA abstracts in the field of linguistics. The aim of the present study is to extend previous observations to the field of law, with the intent of investigating the rhetorical preferences that characterize the members of the international and Italian scientific communities in this disciplinary field.
Within this field, extensive research has been conducted on the analysis of non-academic texts (e.g. Bhatia 1993, 2008; Gotti and Williams 2010; Bhatia et al. 2012). To the best of our knowledge, however, little attention has been paid to the analysis of academic legal texts such as RAs (Feak et al. 2000; Tessuto 2008; Peacock 2011; Sala 2012, 2014; Tessuto 2015), and RA abstracts in particular: in fact, only few studies are known to us (Frey and Kaplan 2010; Tessuto 2012; Hatzitheodorou 2014; Sala 2014; Cavalieri and Preite forthcoming). This paper seeks to fill the gap by providing insights into variation across the two cultures emerged from the linguistic realisations of the rhetorical moves characterizing the abstract genre in the discipline of criminal law
Khoo Kay Kim, professor of Malaysian history : a biobibliometric study
Presents an analysis of the publication productivity, authorship pattern, channels of communication, journal preference and language preference of Professor Dato' Khoo Kay Kim, Professor of Malaysian History in the University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. The results of this biobibliometric study indicate that he can be a role model for future Malaysian historians to emulate his various achievements especially in the field of history education
Author, publisher and bookseller : a tripartite synergy in Nigerian book industry
This work is about the roles of Author, Publisher and Bookseller in Book development in
Nigeria. The paper started by delving into the history of Book Publishing in Nigeria after
which it proceeded by defining who an author, a publisher, and a bookseller is and
expatiated on the indispensable roles of these key actors in Nigerian Book Industry and in
the emerging Information Society. Furthermore, the various constraints to book
development were identified while the paper advised on how the Book Industry can be
further promoted in Nigeria. However, the paper concluded and made recommendations
on how the Book sector can help in enhancing scholarship in the country
[Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author #2]
Report to Chief J. E. Curry, by an unknown author. The report contains a list of officers who gave depositions to the United States Attorney
- …
