1,720,962 research outputs found
Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with discordant rifampicin susceptibility test results
Background: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay was adopted as the initial diagnostic test for patients with presumptive tuberculosis (TB) by the South African National TB Control programme in December 2010. Rifampicin (RIF) resistance detected by the Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) is confirmed by a line probe assay (LPA) (GenoType MTBDRplus) and/or phenotypic (culture-based) drug susceptibility testing (DST) by MGIT (Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube) on the culture isolate from a 2nd specimen. Although both the Xpert and LPA target the rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene, discordant RIF results (Xpert RIF resistant (RIFR ), LPA RIF susceptible (RIFS )) have been reported. In addition, in cases where genotypic tests detect an rpoB mutation, inferring RIF resistance, routine phenotypic DST may report a RIF susceptible result. This is usually due to disputed rpoB mutations.
Aim: The aims of this study are to determine 1) whether the discordance between Xpert and LPA is due to false RIFR by Xpert or false RIFS by LPA and to elucidate the causes of false results and 2) the frequency and types of rpoB mutations expected to test susceptible on routine phenotypic DST and their corresponding RIF MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration).
Methods: Consecutive isolates with discordant Xpert RIFR and LPA RIFS results were selected during routine review. For the Xpert, parameters including bacterial DNA load and cycle threshold (Ct) of the probes were evaluated. In addition, isolates with a pattern of any absent rpoB WT band and absent MUT band on the LPA strip (“miscellaneous rpoB mutations”) were selected for MIC testing using the MGIT 960 system and EpiCenter TB eXiST software. Sanger sequencing of the rpoB gene from codon 462 to 591 was performed on all selected isolates.
Results and discussion: Discordant Xpert/LPA results: From the total of 1542 patients with RIFR results by Xpert, 106 (6.9%) had a discordant LPA RIFS result. Sequencing results were available for 101 isolates of which 78 (77.2%) had no rpoB mutation detected and these were categorized as false RIFR by Xpert. Mutations were detected by sequencing in the remaining 23 (22.8%); these were categorized as false RIFS by LPA. Probe delay occurred in 56/76 (73.7%) cases compared with 104/1436 (7.2%) controls (p 4 and there is a Very Low bacterial load has a positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.2 % of being false and where the Ct max is between 4.1 and 4.9 with Very Low bacterial load, the PPV of a false result increases to 85.7%. For the false RIFS results by LPA, the majority 11/23 (47.8%) were due to technical errors. In 6/23 (26.1%) it was due to mixed infection and in 2/23 (8.7%) there was laboratory mix up. In the remaining 4/23 (17.4%) the cause could not be determined and mixed infection or a laboratory mix up could not be excluded.
Discordant genotypic/phenotypic results: RIF resistance was detected in 1502 patients by LPA, of which 169 (11.3%) had a miscellaneous mutation. In addition, a further 21 isolates were selected from “Part 1” of the study, where sequencing confirmed that the rpoB mutation was not one of the high level / high confidence rpoB mutations. A total of 178 isolates had both MIC and rpoB sequencing results. In our study 140/178 (78.7%) isolates with miscellaneous rpoB mutations (n=158) or previously described disputed rpoB mutations (n=20) had MIC values ranging from ≤0.0625 µg/ml to 1.0 µg/ml. An MIC >1.0 µg/m was determined for 38/178 (21.3%) that would have tested RIFR by MGIT DST.
Conclusion: Arising from this study is a laboratory based guideline that is now used within NHLS TB laboratories detailing steps on how to detect possible false RIFR results by Xpert MTB/RIF and on how to troubleshoot discordant Xpert RIFR and LPA RIFS results. A database has been created from the results obtained in this study that lists specific rpoB mutations and their corresponding MIC value and has the potential to assist clinicians in individualizing the patient TB treatment regimen
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
In Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
