322,943 research outputs found
Effect of Canal Length and Curvature on Working Length Alteration with WaveOne Reciprocating Files
No full textThe article “Effect of Canal Length and Curvature on Working Length Alteration with WaveOne Reciprocating Files” by Elio Berutti, Giorgio Chiandussi, Davide Salvatore Paolino, Nicola Scotti, Giuseppe Cantatore, Arnaldo Castellucci and Damiano Pasqualini (J Endod 37[12]:1687–90; 2011] should have included this statement in the author information section: “Giuseppe Cantatore, Arnaldo Castellucci, and Elio Berutti declare that they have financial involvement (patent licensing arrangements) with Dentsply Maillefer with direct financial interest in the materials discussed in this article.” In addition, Dentsply provided some of the instruments used in this study." The authors regret this omission
Introduzione/Premessa
No full textIntroduzione alla "Festschrift" in onore di Mauro Visentin, con interventi di: G. Sasso, A. Ardovino, A. Bellocci, E. Berti, R. Berutti, A. Brancacci, M. Cacciari, M. Cardenas, G. Cherchi, P. Ciccarelli, G. Di Tommaso, M. Donà, M. Ferrari, S. Ghisu, A. Gnoli, M. Herling, S. Maschietti, L. Messinese, N. Parise, G. Perazzoli, S. Petrucciani, M. Pisano, L. Ruggiu, A. Savorelli, D. Spanio, A. Tagliapietra, L. Vero Tarca, U. Ugazio, D. Zucca
Pant'onoma. Studi in onore di Mauro Visentin
No full text"Festschrift" in onore di Mauro Visentin, con interventi di: G. Sasso, A. Ardovino, A. Bellocci, E. Berti, R. Berutti, A. Brancacci, M. Cacciari, M. Cardenas, G. Cherchi, P. Ciccarelli, G. Di Tommaso, M. Donà, M. Ferrari, S. Ghisu, A. Gnoli, M. Herling, S. Maschietti, L. Messinese, N. Parise, G. Perazzoli, S. Petrucciani, M. Pisano, L. Ruggiu, A. Savorelli, D. Spanio, A. Tagliapietra, L. Vero Tarca, U. Ugazio, D. Zucca
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
