1,720,983 research outputs found

    bertrand-caron/atb_api_public: ATB API v0.2

    No full text
    <p>First public release of the ATB API.</p&gt

    bertrand-caron/fragment_capping: Beta Release: Fragment Capping

    No full text
    <p>Beta release of the fragment capping project. The tautomer enumeration is now working, and switches for the most common problems (non-physical tautomers) have been provided: allenes and triple bonds in small rings (size <=7), hydrogenation of phenyl rings. Many test cases have been included (including warfarin, tetraphenylporphyrin).</p&gt

    bertrand-caron/fragment_capping: Beta Release: Fragment Capping

    No full text
    <p>Beta release of the fragment capping project. The tautomer enumeration is now working, and switches for the most common problems (non-physical tautomers) have been provided: allenes and triple bonds in small rings (size <=7), hydrogenation of phenyl rings. Many test cases have been included (including warfarin, tetraphenylporphyrin).</p&gt

    bertrand-caron/fragment_capping: Fragment Capping v0.4

    No full text
    <p>Most likely latest version before submitting the paper.</p> <p>Improved the tests.</p&gt

    bertrand-caron/fourier_series_fit: Fourier series Fit v0.1

    No full text
    <p>Beta release.</p&gt

    bertrand-caron/fragment_capping: Beta Release: Fragment Capping

    No full text
    Beta release of the fragment capping project. The tautomer enumeration is now working, and switches for the most common problems (non-physical tautomers) have been provided: allenes and triple bonds in small rings (size <=7), hydrogenation of phenyl rings. Many test cases have been included (including warfarin, tetraphenylporphyrin)

    bertrand-caron/fragment_capping: Fragment Capping v0.4

    No full text
    Most likely latest version before submitting the paper. Improved the tests

    bertrand-caron/Blind_RMSD: Version 1.0

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;Stable version.&lt;/p&gt

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore