186,171 research outputs found

    Local flat duality of abelian varieties

    No full text
    Let K be a field complete for a discrete valuation and with algebraically closed residue field of positive characteristic p. We prove the existence of a non-degenerate pairing between the first (flat) cohomology group of an abelian variety A over K and the fundamental group of the Néron model of the dual abelian variety. This pairing extends to the p-primary components a pairing introduced by Shafarevich. We relate this pairing with Grothendieck’s pairing

    Canonical Witt formal scheme extensions and p-torsion groups

    No full text
    We study the nth arithmetic jet space of the p-torsion subgroup attached to a smooth commutative formal group scheme. We show that the nth jet space above fits in the middle of a canonical short exact sequence between a power of the formal scheme of Witt vectors of length n and the p-torsion subgroup we started with. This result generalizes a result of Buium on roots of unity

    Arithmetic Jet Spaces

    No full text
    One of the primary objectives of this paper is to establish compatibility between two different jet space functors in the most general context. We first show an adjunction between the jet and the Witt functor on algebras. Following Borger’s approach, we then construct the algebraic jet space functor in the general setting where the base is an arbitrary prolongation sequence. We then show that this functor is representable in the category of schemes and that Buium’s jet space can be recovered by the p-adic completion of this representable scheme. As an application, this allows us to strengthen a result of Buium on the relation between Greenberg’s transform and the special fiber of jet spaces, including the ramified cas

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Withdrawn by Author

    No full text
    <p>Withdrawn by Author </p&gt

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    No full text
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore