1,721,039 research outputs found
Les Bibles castillanes
No full textBerger Samuel. Les Bibles castillanes. In: Romania, tome 28 n°111, 1899. pp. 360-408
Les Bibles provençales et vaudoises
No full textBerger Samuel. Les Bibles provençales et vaudoises. In: Romania, tome 18 n°71, 1889. pp. 353-422
Nouvelles recherches sur les Bibles provençales et catalanes
No full textBerger Samuel. Nouvelles recherches sur les Bibles provençales et catalanes. In: Romania, tome 19 n°76, 1890. pp. 505-561
Les Bibles castillanes et portugaises (fin )
No full textBerger Samuel. Les Bibles castillanes et portugaises (fin ). In: Romania, tome 28 n°112, 1899. pp. 508-567
La Bible italienne au moyen âge
No full textBerger Samuel. La Bible italienne au moyen âge. In: Romania, tome 23 n°91, 1894. pp. 358-431
Un commentaire sicilien sur la Passion selon saint Mathieu
No full textBerger Samuel. Un commentaire sicilien sur la Passion selon saint Mathieu. In: Romania, tome 28 n°109, 1899. pp. 120-122
Les préfaces jointes aux livres de la Bible dans les manuscrits de la Vulgate
No full textBerger Samuel. Les préfaces jointes aux livres de la Bible dans les manuscrits de la Vulgate. In: Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l'Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres de l'Institut de France. Première série, Sujets divers d'érudition. Tome 11, 2e partie, 1904. pp. 1-78
Berger (Samuel). Quam notitiam linguae hebraicae habuerint Christiani medii aevi temporibus In Gallia. Paris, 1893 ; in-8° de XII
No full textBacher Wilhelm. Berger (Samuel). Quam notitiam linguae hebraicae habuerint Christiani medii aevi temporibus In Gallia. Paris, 1893 ; in-8° de XII. In: Revue des études juives, tome 28, n°55, janvier-mars 1894. pp. 149-160
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
