1,720,954 research outputs found

    Multifrequency multicomponent tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears

    No full text
    A multifrequency multicomponent admittance meter was used to evaluate 70 ears of patients affected by fenestral otosclerosis (Os ears), monolateral (16 cases) or bilateral (27 cases). The 16 contralateral ears of the patients with monolateral otosclerosis who presented a pure-tone air-bone gap less than 10 dB were evaluated separately (Cos ears). A group of 48 ears belonging to 24 otologically normal subjects (N ears), with hearing thresholds better than or equal to 10 dB HL in the frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz served as a control group. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the acoustic admittance characteristics of the three groups of ears, with particular regard to the parameters represented by the resonance frequency (RF), the acoustic conductance value (G) at RF and the individual interaural differences in these two parameters in the N and Cos groups. The degree to which fenestral otosclerosis can influence variations of RF and the correlation between the value of RF and conductive hearing loss in patients with clinically confirmed pictures and in the controlateral ears in the cases where the disease was clinically unilateral were also investigated. The study reveals statistically significant differences between the RF means in the N group (1085 ± 244 Hz) vs the Os group (1264 ± 320 Hz) (p < 0.001) and between the G means in the N group (5.33 ± 1.72 mmhos) vs the Os group (4.46 ± 2.54 mmhos) (p = 0.04) and N group vs Cos group (3.42 ± 2.27 mmhos) (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the value of RF and conductive hearing loss. This study also shows how prognostic value may also be attributed to conductance at middle-ear pressure balancement: extremely low values for this parameter at RF are indicative of initial otosclerotic involvement of the oval window

    [Videofluoroscopic study of deglutition in patients with multiple sclerosis].

    No full text
    Multiple sclerosis is a neurological disease that affects the I/II motor neurons of the CNS and its symptoms include oropharyngeal dysphagia. The onset and course of this dysphagia significantly conditions the progression of the disease. The present study evaluates the incidence on deglutition and type of alterations in a sampling of 10 multiple sclerosis patients of which 4 showed clinical signs of dysphagia. The results, obtained by combining quantitative (clinical severity) and qualitative (functional alterations) parameters showed that 9 of the 10 patients (90%) presented radiological abnormalities in the progression of the bolus. The conclusion drawn is that the high prevalence of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis, even if not always manifest clinically, justifies drawing up a standard protocol for radiological evaluation and clinical follow-up in order to screen those patients at greater risk of pulmonary complications and delay them as long as possible

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore