1,720,961 research outputs found
Recent advances and future challenges in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms
No full text: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with increasing incidence, whose diagnosis is usually delayed, negatively impacting on patients' prognosis. The latest advances in pathological classifications, biomarker identification and imaging techniques may provide early detection, leading to personalized treatment strategies. In this narrative review the recent developments in diagnosis of NEN are discussed including progresses in pathological classifications, biomarker and imaging. Furthermore, the challenges that lie ahead are investigated. By discussing the limitations of current approaches and addressing potential roadblocks, we hope to guide future research directions in this field. This article is proposed as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of NEN. Update of pathological classifications and the availability of standardized templates in pathology and radiology represent a substantially improvement in diagnosis and communication among clinicians. Additional immunohistochemistry markers may now enrich pathological classifications, as well as miRNA profiling. New and multi-analytical circulating biomarkers, as liquid biopsy and NETest, are being proposed for diagnosis but their validation and availability should be improved. Radiological imaging strives for precise, non-invasive and less harmful technique to improve safety and quality of life in NEN patient. Nuclear medicine may benefit of somatostatin receptors' antagonists and membrane receptor analogues. Diagnosis in NEN still represents a challenge due to their complex biology and variable presentation. Further advancements are necessary to obtain early and minimally invasive diagnosis to improve patients' outcomes
Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Rates in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Patients: Impact of Gender Difference
No full textIntroduction: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is the most common inherited syndrome associated with NET development and gender-specific differences are emerging in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to analyze gender difference in a single cohort of MEN-1 patients focusing on duodeno-pancreatic (DP)-NET and survival rates. Methods: MEN-1 patients referred to the Endocrinology Unit of the "Federico II"University of Naples, ENETS CoE, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Among 100 MEN-1 patients enrolled, 59 (59%) were female and 41 (41%) male, and mean age at diagnosis was 39.4 years (range 5-86). No statistically significant association was identified between MEN-1 clinical manifestations and gender (primary hyperparathyroidism [PHPT] p: 1.0, DP-NET p: 0.83, pituitary adenoma [PA] p: 0.84, lung NET p: 0.64, and thymic NET p: 0.10), and similarly, age at diagnosis of MEN-1 and its individual manifestations was similar between genders. Survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between genders in DP-NET patients regarding progression disease p: 1.0 and death p: 1.0. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with DP-NET was 98.6 months (range 3-288), and mean overall survival (OS) was 130.1 months (range 3-444 months), without differences between genders (PFS p: 0.67 and OS p: 0.60). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS and OS showed no differences between genders (PFS p: 0.92; OS p: 0.87). Conclusion: In this MEN-1 cohort, no gender differences in the occurrence of PHPT, PA, DP-NET, lung NET, and thymic NET, nor in survival outcomes including PFS and OS within the DP-NET subcohort, emerged. Therefore, this study supports similar screening and follow-up for both male and female MEN-1 patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
