1,721,006 research outputs found
Janine Garrisson, Les protestants au XVIe siècle
Benedict Philip. Janine Garrisson, Les protestants au XVIe siècle. In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 47ᵉ année, N. 1, 1992. pp. 157-159
Janine Garrisson, Les protestants au XVIe siècle
Benedict Philip. Janine Garrisson, Les protestants au XVIe siècle. In: Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations. 47ᵉ année, N. 1, 1992. pp. 157-159
Conférence de M. Philip Benedict
Benedict Philip. Conférence de M. Philip Benedict. In: École pratique des hautes études, Section des sciences religieuses. Annuaire. Tome 107, 1998-1999. 1998. pp. 423-427
Benedict (Philip) Rouen during the Wars of Religion
Roussel Bernard. Benedict (Philip) Rouen during the Wars of Religion. In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°55/2, 1983. pp. 209-210
A. L. Beier et Roger Finlay (éd.), London 1500-1700. The Making of the Metropolis
Benedict Philip. A. L. Beier et Roger Finlay (éd.), London 1500-1700. The Making of the Metropolis. In: Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 43ᵉ année, N. 2, 1988. pp. 529-531
A. L. Beier et Roger Finlay (éd.), London 1500-1700. The Making of the Metropolis
Benedict Philip. A. L. Beier et Roger Finlay (éd.), London 1500-1700. The Making of the Metropolis. In: Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations. 43ᵉ année, N. 2, 1988. pp. 529-531
Heurs et malheurs d'un gros bourg drapant. Note sur la population de Darnétal aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles
Benedict Philip. Heurs et malheurs d'un gros bourg drapant. Note sur la population de Darnétal aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. In: Annales de Normandie, 28ᵉ année, n°3, 1978. pp. 195-205
Alien Registration- Benedict, Philip (Presque Isle, Aroostook County)
https://digitalmaine.com/alien_docs/34391/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
