1,721,034 research outputs found
Conférence-débat autour de l'ouvrage de Benedetta Rossi Conference debate about the work of Benedetta Rossi
No full textCette conférence-débat permettra de discuter de l’ouvrage de Benedetta Rossi, paru aux éditions Cambridge University Press en 2015 avec Frederick Cooper (New York University), Ghislaine Lydon (Université de Californie, Los Angeles) et Henri Médard (Aix-Marseille université)
Benedetta Rossi, L’intercessione nel tempo della fine. Studio dell’intercessione profetica nel libro di Geremia (Analecta Biblica 204; Rome: Gregorian & Biblical Press 2013). Pp 462. € 34. ISBN: 978-88-7653-206-1
No full textBook review: Benedetta Rossi, L’intercessione nel tempo della fine. Studio dell’intercessione profetica nel libro di Geremia (Analecta Biblica 204; Rome: Gregorian & Biblical Press 2013). Pp 462. € 34. ISBN: 978-88-7653-206-1DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/ba.2018.8.1.11
"Seconde generazioni", un fantasma che s'aggira. Sei stazioni geostoriche e una pista situata di lavoro
No full textIl saggio discute criticamente la categoria di "seconde generazioni" e sulla base di una ricerca sul campo ne discute le modificazioni nel tempo, in particolare nel rapporto tra le geneazion
Harnet Streets: un progetto del Collettivo Tezeta per risignificare il paesaggio coloniale romano
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
