1,720,996 research outputs found
Ferrier on the studio stage between two people, ca. 1965 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-8
Ferrier, wearing a carnation in his button hole, ca. 1960 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-3
Ferrier seated in a cane chair, ca. 1965 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-1
Ferrier seated in a cane chair in front of a painted backdrop, ca. 1965 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-4
Ferrier against a plain background, ca. 1961 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-2
Ferrier, wearing a surprised expression, ca. 1970 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-5
Ferrier on stage with three other people, ca.1970 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-6
Ferrier, seated, with a backdrop of arches and hung photographs, ca. 1965 [picture] /
No full textAlso available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http://nla.gov.au/nla.pic-an21914050-7
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
