1,721,448 research outputs found
Stroke epidemiology and COVID-19 pandemic
Full text linkPURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the epidemiology, cause and clinical characteristics of incident stroke in different settings and populations. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have shown that there are three main themes in the epidemiology of stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic: COVID-19 seems to be associated with stroke in a significant number of patients. This association has been reported in several clinical series, mainly from China. There is a consistent trend towards a decreased number of hospital admissions of stroke patients during the pandemic. There are no population-based data available on incident stroke in individuals with COVID-19. SUMMARY: In this review, we report on increased rates and severe prognosis of ischemic stroke among individuals with COVID-19, probably explained by hypercoagulability and inflammation, documented since the early phase of disease.We confirm the presence of falling rates of new ischemic stroke admissions in hospitals, probably due to social consequences of the pandemic: fear to be infected or not adequately treated in the hospital. This phenomenon is restricted to mild stroke and transient ischemic attacks.Short and long-term consequences of this trend of new strokes in the pandemic need to be evaluated
The management of epilepsy in the 1990s. Acquisitions, uncertainties and priorities for future research.
No full textAbstract: The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy has made considerable progress during the last decade, due to improved knowledge of the clinical pharmacology of individual drugs, acquisition of new information on the factors affecting response and need for drug treatment, and development of promising new agents. Once a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy has been made (which generally requires the occurrence of more than one seizure), treatment should be started with a single drug selected on the basis of seizure type and tolerability profile. Although there are important regional differences in prescribing patterns and individual circumstances may dictate alternative choices, carbamazepine is generally regarded as the preferred treatment for partial seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) while valproic acid (sodium valproate) is usually the first choice in most forms of generalised epilepsies.
To achieve therapeutic success, the daily dosage must be tailored to meet individual needs, and there is suggestive evidence that in some patients the dosage prescribed initially may be unnecessarily large. Plasma antiepileptic drug concentrations may aid in the individualisation of dosage, but should not be regarded as a substitute for careful monitoring of clinical response.
Although overall about 70% of patients can be completely controlled, response rate is influenced by a number of factors, the most important of which are seizure type and syndromic form. The importance of a correct syndromic classification for rational drug selection has been poorly assessed and represents a major area for future research. Patients who do not respond to the highest tolerated dose of the initially prescribed drug maybe switched to monotherapy with an alternative agent or may be given add-on treatment with a second drug. Appropriate prospective trials are required to assess the merits of either strategy. If add-on therapy is selected and the patient becomes seizure free, it may be possible to discontinue the drug prescribed initially and reinstitute monotherapy. Only a minority of patients are likely to require multiple drug therapy, and it remains to be established whether specific drug combinations are more effective than others.
Until further information becomes available, the new agents should be reserved for patients failing to respond to the conventional treatments of first choice. Patients whose seizures cannot be controlled by available drugs should be reassessed, and polytherapy should be maintained only when there is clear evidence that benefits outweigh possible adverse effects. In many patients who have been seizure free for at least 2 years it may be possible to gradually discontinue all medications. The decision to withdraw treatment is determined largely by the risk of seizure relapse which, in turn, is primarily dependent on the syndromic form
SHOULD ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS BE WITHDRAWN IN SEIZURE-FREE PATIENTS?
No full textDiscontinuation of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment is a valuable option in patients with epilepsy who have been seizure free for 2 years or longer. However, the decision to withdraw AEDs must be based on a balanced view of the overall risk of seizure relapse, the factors most likely to affect that risk, and the medical, emotional and social implications of treatment continuation versus treatment withdrawal. In a critical review of 28 studies accounting for 4571 patients (2758 children, 1020 adults and a combined group of 793), most with at least 2 years of seizure remission, the proportion of patients with relapses during or after AED withdrawal ranged from 12 to 66%. Using life-table analysis, the cumulative probability of remaining seizure-free in children was 66-96% at 1 year and 61-91% at 2 years after withdrawal of AEDs. The corresponding values in adults were 39-74% and 35-57%, respectively. The relapse rate was highest in the first 12 months (especially in the first 6 months) after withdrawal and tended to decrease thereafter. Based on a previously published meta-analysis of data published up to 1992, the pooled relapse risk was 25% (95% CI 21, 30%) at 1 year and 29% (95% CI 24, 34%) at 2 years after AED withdrawal. The factors associated with a higher-than-average risk of seizure relapse included adolescent-onset epilepsy, partial seizures, the presence of an underlying neurological condition, and abnormal EEG findings at the time of AED withdrawal in children. Factors associated with a lower-than-average risk were childhood-onset epilepsy, idiopathic generalised epilepsy and - for children - a normal EEG. Selected epilepsy syndromes (e.g. benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy) may be associated with significantly different outcomes after AED withdrawal. All these factors and their combinations may contribute to the development of guidelines for practising physicians to help them in making the best decision related to treatment discontinuation. The decision plan should also take into account social factors (driving license, job and leisure activities) as well as emotional and personal factors, and must be tailored to and discussed with the individual patient and his/her family
SHOULD ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS BE USED FOR PREVENTING SEIZURES AFTER ACUTE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURES?
No full text
Epilepsy Syndromes in Development. Introduction.
No full textIn the 2001 proposal of classification of epileptic syndromes, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission includes four “epileptic syndromes in development,” namely migrating partial seizures of infancy, myoclonic status in nonprogressive encephalopathies, generalized epilepsies with febrile seizures plus, and familial focal epilepsy with variable foci (Engel, 2001). Actually, several other epileptic conditions are still awaiting a more precise definition. Among these are the syndrome “eyelid myoclonia with or without absences (EMA),” described as a generalized epileptic syndrome more than 30 years ago by Jeavons, and Panayiotopoulos syndrome (PS) evolving from an “early-onset variant of idiopathic (benign) occipital lobe epilepsy” to an “idiopathic partial epilepsy with predominantly autonomic seizures
Long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study
No full textOBJECTIVE:
To determine the long-term survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and identify predictors of prolonged survival in a population-based cohort of newly diagnosed patients.
METHODS:
An incident cohort from a population-based registry during the years 1998 through 2002 in Lombardy, Italy was followed until death or to February 28, 2013. Age, sex, date of onset of symptoms, site of onset, date of diagnosis, and El Escorial diagnostic category were collected. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards function was used to identify independent prognostic predictors. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were used to assess the 5-year and 10-year excess mortality of ALS patients.
RESULTS:
Included were 280 men and 203 women aged 18 to 93 years. Spinal onset ALS was present in 312 cases (64.6%). Definite ALS was diagnosed in 213 cases (44.1%), probable ALS in 130 (26.9%), possible ALS in 93 (19.3%), and suspected ALS in 47 (9.7%). The cumulative time-dependent survival at 1, 5, and 10 years from diagnosis was 76.2%, 23.4%, and 11.8%, respectively. Independent predictors included younger age, the diagnosis of possible/suspected ALS, spinal onset, and symptoms having started >12 months previously at diagnosis. SMR was 9.4 at 5 years and 5.4 at 10 years. SMR at 10 years was higher until age 75 year, predominating in women, and became nonsignificant for males thereafter.
INTERPRETATION:
The outcome in ALS varies with phenotype. Longer survival is predicted by younger age, spinal onset, male gender, and suspected ALS. After age 75 years, 10-year survival in men with ALS is similar to the general population
Appendix to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (2nd edition): application of diagnostic criteria for tension-type headache
No full text- …
