1,721,753 research outputs found
BECK, Ulrich, Una Europa alemana (2012)
No full textBECK, Ulrich, Una Europa alemana (2012) BuenosAires: Paidós, Estado y Sociedad; Trad. Alicia ValeroMartín, 114 paginas
BECK, Ulrich, Una Europa alemana (2012)
Get PDFBECK, Ulrich, Una Europa alemana (2012) BuenosAires: Paidós, Estado y Sociedad; Trad. Alicia ValeroMartín, 114 paginas
Beck (Ulrich) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity
No full textSéguy Jean. Beck (Ulrich) Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity . In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°82, 1993. p. 317
D'une théorie critique de la société vers la théorie d'une auto-critique sociale
No full textBeck Ulrich. D'une théorie critique de la société vers la théorie d'une auto-critique sociale. In: Déviance et société. 1994 - Vol. 18 - N°3. pp. 333-344
The informed Practitioner: Communication between social scientists and practitioners
Get PDFHessler G, Unzicker K. The informed Practitioner: Communication between social scientists and practitioners. 2006.This paper examines interaction processes and knowledge exchange between social scientists and practitioners. We conducted semi-structured interviews with practitioners working in specified fields of practice who have been involved in sociological research projects - as subjects of investigation or as experts. These research projects focused on social integration and disintegration in different sectors of German society. The interviewed practitioners were working in sectors under scrutiny by the researchers, such as public administration, social work, and labor relations. Therefore, we assume that social scientists and practitioners are concerned with similar aspects of society - the social scientists from a more theoretical point of view and the practitioners from a more practical point of view.
In this paper we focus specifically on the process of knowledge exchange between social scientists and practitioners described above. In four case studies we present findings that elucidate the practitioners' understanding of the social scientists' research and reveal whether they regard the research as valuable for their work. We describe dimensions that have an influence on interaction and knowledge exchange: interest and approach to the topic under investigation; the motivation of social scientists and practitioners to cooperate with each other; the conditions under which contact is established; and the position of both groups in their own fields. Finally, we look at what expectations practitioners have of scientific knowledge and identify some obstacles to interaction and knowledge exchange
professionssoziologische und professionsrechtliche Aspekte einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung
No full textUlrich Beck (1944-2015)
No full textBeck, Ulrich, (2001) [1986], La société du risque. Sur la voie d'une autre modernité. París, Aubier. Beck, Ulrich, (1999) World Risk Society. Polity Press/Blackwell Publishers. Beck, Ulrich, (2015) “Emancipatory Catastrophism: What does it Mean to Climate Change and Risk Society?” en Current Sociology. Vol. 63, núm. 1, enero, pp. 115-120. Beck, Ulrich y Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge, Polity Press. Beck, Ulrich y Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, (2011) Distant Love. Cambridge, Polity Press.
BECK, Ulrich. "Sobre el terrorismo y la guerra": Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica, 2002, 62 pp.
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
